Extraterrestrial Presence, UFOs, Remote Viewing, Conspiracies. Underground Bases

Dragonfly Drones Still In Our Skies – New 2015 Witness

Posted on August 8, 2016

By Truthfall.com editor – Craig Brown

 

It’s been more than 2 years now since I last wrote about the mysterious ET Dragonfly Drones. My previous witness ‘Mary’ told me of how she encountered one of these intimidating craft sitting silentl and motionless in the air only feet away outside her mother’s apartment complex in Phoenix, Arizona in 1981 (the earliest recorded sighting so far).

 

Incredibly, Mary had been contacted by the infamous whistle-blower, ‘Isaac’ NEARLY FIFTEEN YEARS BEFORE his letter to Coast to Coast AM where he revealed that he had worked as a scientist to back-engineer this same non-human technology, and in particular to try and decipher the strange hieroglyphic symbol ‘language’.

“I walked back across the room to look outside to see what had caused the shadow, and there was THIS thing! It was not moving, not making a sound, just…there. I just stood there for a few seconds to try to wrap my head around what I was seeing…what WAS I seeing?” — Mary

Despite being a newly uncovered witness to the phenomena, Mary’s experience of the drones occurred way back in 1981, and so the drone story has long been considered a UFO cold-case with the most recent documented sightings in the timeline occurring some eight years ago in 2008.

Drone overhead. Photo by Rajman1977 taken in the town of Campbell, CA in May 2007

Drone overhead. Photo by Rajman1977 taken in the town of Campbell, CA in May 2007

New Witness

 

But now in 2016, I have a brand new witness, whose remarkable account you will read in a moment.  My new witness is highly significant for this reason; his account of what he saw suggests the mysterious dragonfly drones are still active in our skies and perhaps more disturbingly, have been ever-present here on earth, with purpose unknown.

 

“I do now think — are these things everywhere and people just don’t know it? And if so, how long have they been up there?” — Mike

 

The Drone Phenomenon

 

The drone story and timeline of events is quite complex, so before diving straight in, it would be a good idea to bring this new eyewitness testimony into context and look at a quick potted history on how this whole saga has unfolded.

 

There are witness accounts of Dragonfly Drones beginning in 1981, but the drones only came to widespread attention in 2006 when a series of very detailed and clear daytime photographs of the unusual craft emerged – the photos were taken by a central California resident calling himself ‘Chad’ — he and his wife were hiking near Los Gatos (originally reported as Bakersfield), when they noticed the craft ‘hovering’ close above. It ‘flew’ over the top of them very slowly and Chad managed to take several clear daytime pictures. Chad sent those images to the popular paranormal radio show Coast to Coast AM in an effort to try and understand what exactly he and his wife had seen.

 

The photographs also made their way to investigative reporter Linda Moulton-Howe who began reporting the unfolding events in a series of articles about this strange new phenomenon. I was intrigued by the many bizarre aspects of the case such as the strange self-activating symbol ‘language’, the clarity of the images and how these new sightings were of craft never previously described in any of the literature, and so I began following the story very closely.

 

There seemed to be no letup after that first sighting, as throughout 2006 and 2007 the sightings continued when, one after one, more than a dozen witnesses reported and photographed the strange drone craft throughout the United States, with sightings particularly clustered in California for some reason. Eyewitnesses described encounters with objects having a “ring body” with various “appendages”, and a long single ‘wing’ or “boom-like” protuberance similar to a long ceiling fan blade. In most cases the craft appeared stationery or very slow moving, silent, emitting no sound except sometimes a static, crackling, similar to high voltage electricity usually accompanied by the feeling of a static charge in the air.  The majority of the witnesses observed and photographed these strange craft as they ‘hovered’ just feet above trees or power poles in suburban streets while others observed them slowly gliding or rotating over the tops of tress in state forested areas. It seemed as though not a month went by without a new report and a new eyewitness account.

 

Isaac & PACL

 

Then in June 2007, and after many witness accounts had emerged, a webpage appeared written by someone calling himself Isaac. In a long letter published on the same page, Isaac told of how he was a scientist on the project and how he knew all about the strange drones people were seeing. ‘Isaac’ was a pseudo-name he was using to protect his identity as a whistle-blower. As well as his letter explaining his role within the drone project, Isaac had also published a cache of leaked documents and photographs allegedly from the highly secretive USAP (Unacknowledged Special Access Project) he worked on in Palo Alto, California. Isaac claimed he could identify the strange craft and symbol language the witnesses were seeing as he himself had been closely involved in back-engineering them as part of the classified project he had been a part of. That unacknowledged project was named C.A.R.E.T – Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology. The project was operated out of what was made to look like a normal Silicon Valley computer / tech office building, but inside, teams of scientists protected by intense security were attempting to reverse-engineer and understand the non-human technology – a process known as ‘extraction’. An archive copy of the original Isaac webpage can be found here.

 

According to Isaac, the “extraction” of the non-human technology proved extremely difficult despite the computing and manpower resources available to the scientists.  The strange technology and artifacts contained no apparent circuitry or wiring but appeared simply as solid objects, however it appeared that the objects had their function mapped out on a molecular level such that by placing the object in a particular field it would ‘self-activate’ and assume it’s role or function. The concept is extremely difficult to grasp but it was emphasised by Isaac that the special symbols found on the objects needed to be in an exact sequence, in perfect proportions and detail, and together with the correct field applied, the object would then function as intended.

 

Commercialise Non-Human Technology

 

According to Isaac, the whole idea behind the C.A.R.E.T project was to take this technology of non-human origin and figure out how it worked so that it could be back engineered into commercially viable products and mainstream technologies which would ultimately be patented and released for public consumption. The profits would then be funneled straight back into those unacknowledged black projects.

 

During Isaac’s time there from 1984-1987, neither he nor the many other scientists working there were ever informed precisely where the technology they were working on originated – they were only told that it was non-human in origin. Isaac and the other scientists worked on their own or in very small groups like any other secure compartmentalised project, but eventually the lack of background information on the items they were given to work with, together with the ruthless compartmetalisation led to a lot of frustration with their military bosses.

 

Frustrated, Isaac chose to leave the project, but before he did, he managed to smuggle out a cache of documentation including the photographs and scans. One of the documents which was published was called the Q4-86 Research Document (4th quarter of 1986) which outlined four particular technologies being worked on by the scientists at the Palo Alto Caret Laboratories, (known as PACL).

 

Those four technologies listed in the Q4-86 document were listed as follows:

  1. Personal Anti-Gravity Generator.
  2. Three Dimensional Image Recorder / Projector.
  3. A complex system of symbols and geometric constructs capable of both defining the functionality of artifacts as well as manipulating their behaviour, crudely analogous to a computer programming language, but without the need for a compilation / interpretation phase.
  4. Item 4 – had been blacked out [by PACL] and was unreadable.

The photograph below shows one of the key artifacts worked on by PACL which utilised gravity modification. The image which was taken directly from the Q4-86 Research Document shows an object with a multi-ring body and appendages. Beside the main object are two smaller ‘i-beams’. When the main object was activated in the presence of a particular field the i-beams would literally snap into position around the object – it would appear as if there was open space between the parts, but they would actually be invisibly ‘interconnected’ with as much strength as if they were both part of the same solid object. Obviously, this concept is very difficult to grasp based on our limited human understanding of gravity manipulation and the quantum world, but that is essentially the claim.

 

However outlandish this concept may seem at first, I  am at this point reminded of a quote by the great author and futurist Arthur C. Clarke — his insightful quote made many decades ago gives a glorious perspective on the perceived boundaries of our own human technological limitations — “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”. Not a truer word spoken, and in the case of the drone technology it surpassed our limited human technological boundaries and our imagination of the possible.

Drone technology close up with hieroglyphic symbols. Image taken from the Q4-86 Research document allegedly smuggled out of the CARET facility and published by Isaac.

Drone technology close up with hieroglyphic symbols. Image taken from the Q4-86 Research document allegedly smuggled out of the CARET facility and published by Isaac.

Photos showing the non-human technology taken from the Q4-86 document allegedly smuggled out of the C.A.R.E.T facility.

Photos showing the non-human technology taken from the Q4-86 document allegedly smuggled out of the C.A.R.E.T facility.

Cold Case

 

I continued to follow the Dragonfly Drone story vehemently, looking out for new reports and witness accounts — hoping for a breakthrough, but then as 2008 drew to a close and after many months of inactivity, the sightings seemed to dry-up.  I wondered for several years, perhaps like many of you, if that would be the last we’d ever hear of the Dragonfly Drones. I had to acknowledge the possibility that whatever or whoever was behind the strange phenomenon had possibly suspended or even terminated the program, possibly due to all the unwanted attention.

 

Perhaps more chillingly, was the thought that ‘they’, whoever ‘they’ were, may have finally perfected the occasionally malfunctioning cloaking technology, and that the drones were still operating in our atmosphere with impunity — but only now completely undetectable.

 

In 2013,  I took the search for new information into my own hands and so began writing about the drones —  my hope was that it would result in new information and / or witnesses coming to light. To my delight, it did just that – and in spectacular fashion.

 

My first witness is probably one of the most significant of all time, not because of her sighting, but for the fact she had a unique contact from the mysterious ‘Isaac’ many years after her sighting. ‘Mary’ had contacted me after seeing the image of the Chad drone,  which according to her was eerily similar to the photograph she had taken herself decades before. She had now come forward with her story after an astonishing 34 years — previously choosing to share her strange experience only with close friends and family.

 

In 1981 when visiting with her husband at her mother’s apartment building in Phoenix Arizona, she had gone into her mother’s bedroom, then had went to leave but then noticed a large shadow outside the bedroom window. When she looked out she was shocked to discover one of these craft silently hovering only a few feet above outside the window.  As I mentioned previously, ‘Mary’s encounter in 1981 was remarkable in itself for many reasons. Hers is not only the first recorded sighting in the timeline but she is also the only known witness to have ever been contacted by the mysterious ‘Isaac’, who in his one-time only email to Mary, gave her some unique insights into the nature of the dragonfly drone phenomenon.

 

You can read my entire report on Mary’s encounter with the drones and contact with Isaac here. My report was also published by Linda Moulton-Howe on her Earthfiles website in 2014. ( View original screenshots here – one,two).

 

My thought as soon as I saw it was – what the hell is that thing?” — Mike

 

Timeline

As of the time of writing I am now in the peculiar position of uncovering both the oldest (1981) and newest (2015) witness sightings with the timeline of Dragonfly Drones accounts now stretching from 1981 to 2015  - an astonishing 34 years!

 

Listed below are the core dragonfly drone sightings in date order – not necessarily in the order they were reported. Some are listed as anonymous or as pseudo-names as they have professional careers they need to protect or do not want any unwanted intrusion into their families lives.

 

“Mary” – Phoenix, AZ. 1981

Anonymous – Barksdale AFB, CA. 1987

Ned White – Sitgreaves National Forest, AZ. Oct 1995

Jane – Hartshorne, OK. (2 X sightings) June 2003

Shirley P. – Sequoia National Park, May 2005

Mr Smith – Birmingham, AL. May 2006

Mother and two kids – Yosemite National Park, CA. June 2007

Husband and wife – Lake Tahoe, CA. May 2007

Chad – Los Gatos, CA. May 11th 2007

Rajinder Satyanarayana, Capitola, CA. May 20th 2007

Stephen – Saratoga, CA. June 6th 2007

Ty B (and 7 friends) – Big Basin, Saratoga, CA. June 7th 2007

Brent Yearout – Camas, WA. June 7th 2007

“Ted Connors” – Montgomery, AL. June 25th 2007

Isaac June 25th 2007 – Palo Alto / C.A.R.E.T / PACL

Anonymous (NUFORC.org report) – Tomball, TX. June 19th, 2007

Melody Thaxton – Van Buren, AR. Nov 2007

“David Smith” — north of Cincinnati OH, Jun 6th 2008

Anonymous (NUFORC.org report) – Hendersonville, TN. August 4th 2008

NEW WITNESS Mike Nicols – Little Rock, AR. April 9th, 2015

 

New Witness

 

In April 2013 I setup a Dragonfly Drones Facebook Page as an additional contact point for anyone who had information to share. Already, the page has been very successful as several important witnesses including Mary have come forward via this channel, and on June 17th — I received a brand new message…

 

 “Don’t know if you still follow this or even if this helps. I have no photo evidence but in early April 2015 in Little Rock, Arkansas. I saw one of these things. It was a little different from the ones you have pictures of but it did have the long arm and circles. I just now found your site. I have researched this after I seen it and found that some say it’s a hoax. What I saw was real.”

 

So for the first time in nearly EIGHT YEARS I have a RECENT witness to the Dragonfly Drone phenomenon.

 

My new witness had his sighting a little over a year ago on April 9th, 2015 and is the first newly documented sighting since 2008. He is very protective of his family and so understandably, does not want any unnecessary attention brought to them.  So to honour his request for anonymity, and for the purposes of telling his eyewitness account I will call him ‘Mike Nichols ’.

 

Mike is a 49 year old single father of two who lives in the city of Little Rock, Arkansas.

 

Little Rock is the capital and the most populous city in the state of Arkansas. The city derives its name from a rock formation along the river named “La Petite Roche” by the French in 1799. The 2013 census had the population listed at around 725,000.

 

I began by asking Mike what the circumstances were around his encounter with one of these strange Dragonfly Drones?

 

“I left the house a little before dusk, still light out — to run to the store. I live in a suburban neighborhood with a lot of trees. Not highly populated.

 

I pulled up to the stop sign to pull out [onto] the main road when I saw a big drone like thing – flying/gliding? — about 20 feet above the tree line — I had my window down and actually stuck my head out and watched it go right over the top of me”.

 

What was the exact location of the stop sign where you had the sighting?

 

“The stop sign I was at when it passed over me was the cross section of Manor Ave and Colonel Glenn Road. I was on Manor Avenue waiting to take a left on Colonel Glenn Road. I saw it passing  above the parking lot of that day-care centre going southwest passing over me and over some tall trees back behind on the right rear of my vehicle. I saw it immediately when I came to the stop sign”.

 

Stop Sign

Facing north – The stop sign on Manor Avenue where Mike had stopped his car waiting to turn onto Colonel Glenn Road – Click photo to enlarge.

To the left in the photo - the childcare centre with it's parking lot over which Mike first saw the drone.

To the left in the photo – the childcare centre with it’s parking lot over which Mike first saw the drone.

Facing West - the parking lot over which Mike saw the drone can be seen with a number of cars in it.

Facing West – the parking lot over which Mike saw the drone can be seen with a number of parked cars.

Can you remember what your first thoughts were when you saw it?

 

“I thought as soon as I saw it was – what the hell is that thing? And even thought to myself I don’t think I’m supposed to see this thing. The total time I saw it was maybe about 10 seconds. I stuck my head out the window as it passed over my van. I actually released my seat-belt so I could stretch further out the window”.

 

Was anyone else with you when you witnessed it?

 

“I was alone in my vehicle when I saw it”.

 

What size would you estimate it to be?

 

“It was a little bigger than my Dodge Grand Caravan, with the long arm”.

A Dodge Grand Caravan - 5.15 metres long

A Dodge Grand Caravan – 5.15 metres long

Editor’s Note: Mike was sitting at the stop sign in his Dodge Grand Caravan at the time. A Dodge Grand Caravan is a 7 seater minivan (The specifications on the Dodge website has the overall length of a 2016 model at 202.8 inches long (5.15 metres or 16.9 feet long).

 

How fast did it appear to be moving?

 

“I can’t tell you the speed but it wasn’t fast – just more of a glide speed. Didn’t seem fast enough to stay aloft or the shape of it would not be able to stay aloft”.

 

How far away would you estimate it was and how high up?

 

“I’m guessing the trees it passed over are about 65 to 70 feet tall and I would say it was about 20 feet above them”.

 

How did it move? – Did it stop or rotate at any point?

 

“It didn’t rotate at all when I saw it. The main body of it was just as wide as my Dodge Grande Caravan. It had a long like arm that extended out at the direction of south. Which like I said before it moved southeast, which seemed kind of weird. It made it seem to me it flew/glided diagonal to the long arm. It never did stop or hover. It was like a steady glide. Not fast though at all. It didn’t even seem fast enough to even stay aloft; especially for its size”.

 

Did you notice if anyone else saw it – maybe other drivers or pedestrians perhaps?

 

“There were cars coming on Colonel Glenn Road and after it passed over I actually was looking at the different drivers faces to see if they were looking up at it too. Which it didn’t seem like they saw it, no one was looking up. I even said out loud to myself — “Are you kidding me? Nobody sees this thing?!”

 

“After I lost sight of it I pulled out to the left and actually pulled right into the day-care to turn around and head back down Manor Avenue to see if I could see where it went, but the trees get a lot denser that way and I never could see it again”.

Looking south down Manor Avenue. After pulling out and turning at the childcare centre on Colonel, Mike headed back down this road to see if he could find the drone.

Looking south down Manor Avenue. After pulling out and turning at the childcare centre on Colonel, Mike headed back down this road to see if he could find the drone.

Drone first seen moving above parking lot - then glided over Manor Avenue and disappeared over the tops of the trees to the south east.

Drone first seen moving above parking lot – then glided over Manor Avenue and disappeared over the tops of the trees to the south east.

Aerial View of the Drone's path as it crosses the parking lot on Colonel Glenn Road, then across Manor Avenue and finally disappears over the tops of the trees to the south east.

Aerial View of the Drone’s path as it crosses the parking lot on Colonel Glenn Road, then across Manor Avenue and finally disappears over the tops of the trees to the south east.

Past witnesses have described an electrostatic hum or static crackling noise when they were in close proximity to these things.  Did you feel or hear anything as it passed over?

 

“I can’t really say I felt anything, but my ears actually felt funny. Not like they needed to pop, but kind of like I was in a vacuum like maybe something like a hyperbaric chamber? It also did not make any sound at all that I could tell”.

 

Editor’s Note: A hyperbaric chamber is a piece of equipment used to increase the atmospheric pressure. A sealable diving chamber, closed bell or dry bell is a pressure vessel with hatches large enough for people to enter and exit, and a compressed breathing gas supply to raise the internal air pressure. Such chambers provide a supply of oxygen for the user, and are usually called hyperbaric chambers whether used underwater or at the water surface or on land to produce underwater pressures.” – Wikipedia

 

How would you describe this object?

 

It was shiny metallic. I got a perfect view of it as it passed over me for the lack of trees. It seemed like a shiny like metal. But not like chrome or stainless steel or aluminum. I just thought at the time in my head like something futuristic. It didn’t have anything hanging from the bottom. I have thought often about actually what was the length of the long arm. I would say 12ft to 14ft. I wish i could be more precise. The smaller arms about 6 ft. — these lengths I am not accounting for any circles”.

 

In some cases witnesses have described the strange symbol ‘language’ etched onto the underside of the arm-like appendages and body. Did you happen to notice if it had markings of any kind?

 

“At the time I didn’t notice any markings. I think it was probably a little too high up for me to see any. I’m 49 and don’t wear glasses. I don’t have bad vision, but my eyes are not like they were when I was younger”.

 

“I so wish I got a picture. At the time my camera’s glass lens was broken out on my cell phone and couldn’t take pictures. I was kicking myself for not having it fixed as it was going over me. The long arm in that picture is so what still sticks in my mind”.

A closeup of an image from 2007 showing the 'long-arm' that Mike is referring to. Also visible are the strange characters / symbol language.

A closeup of an image by a different witness from 2007 showing the ‘long-arm’ that Mike is referring to. Also visible are the strange characters / symbol language.

Did you notice if it had lights of any kind?

 

“It seemed maybe like it was illuminated, but not. It was like right before dusk so the sun was still up. But I wouldn’t say it was reflecting sunlight or it had its own lights either, if that makes any sense”.

 

I sent Mike four photographs of Dragonfly Drones taken by different witnesses over the years and asked him to identify the closest match to what he saw in Little Rock that day in April 2015 – he identified the closest match as the photographs taken by witness Tyler Branigan [Ty B.] near Saratoga, in Big Basin California on June 11th 2007.

 

Big Basin Drone. Photo by Ty B.

Big Basin Drone. Mike confirmed that this photo was the closest match to what he saw in Little Rock that day. Original photo credit by Ty B.

 

Can you indicate which one of the photos I sent you are most like the one you saw?

 

“Of the pictures you sent it was closest to the biggest bulky one [the Ty B. photograph]. But it was different. When I found that picture of the biggest one on Google I was like – that’s pretty damn close. If you go to my photo section on Facebook you can see that I posted the same picture the day I saw it on April, 9 2015. I did not notice any symbols though”.

 

“Like I said before, it was about 20 feet over the tree line. I turned around and went home and searched the internet looking for military drones but couldn’t find nothing like it. I knew they don’t make drones that big unless they are aircraft shape. Then I found the picture above on the internet; and it’s pretty close to what I saw. It was a little different though but the basics are there. I think the one I saw was bigger. The long arm is what really stands out. It also had the circles”.

 

“It had another like two other arms on it not as long as the main big like arm and one of them I know had like a circle thing if not two on/in like the one in the picture. I don’t think the long arm one had any circular things on/in it though. I couldn’t honestly tell you how many circle-like things it had now. But 3-5 would be my best guess of various sizes. It didn’t have the big thing hanging from the bottom like the one in the picture. I’m not saying though it had a smooth level bottom either, just not nothing as big or low hanging below it as the one in the picture. In the center it seemed to have a lot more to it than the one in the picture. It was like you couldn’t see hardly any sky through the center of it, but it wasn’t like one solid body either. It was like varied size and shape compartment like things? Like the whitish like boxes on the one in the picture. The long arm like thing is still what I remember most”.

 

All of the previous drone sightings mention a tall circular crown of wires on the top. I asked Mike if he happened to notice anything on the top of the object during his sighting.

 

“It did have a lot of something on the top of it. Actually if you turned the one in the picture [above] upside down, the top of the one I saw resembled more of what the bottom crown looked like. But it had even more to it. Like I said before though It didn’t have anything hanging from the bottom”.

 

A previous witnesses was once contacted by the ex-scientist whistle-blower who claims to have worked on back-engineering these things – have you ever been approached by anyone called Isaac over your sighting?

 

“No. I only told family and a few close friends til now. I would freak out if something like that happened.”

 

Did you ever report your sighting to anyone — MUFON for example?

 

“No, I did not contact MUFON or anyone of that nature. I would never want much attention to me and my children”.

 

Have you ever had a UFO sighting before?

 

“I have never seen a UFO or anything like I saw before or since. I will confess that every once in a while when I’m outside I get the feeling something is above me since that day, even though nothing is there. I’m sure it’s just me though on that. But it did leave a lasting impression on me though. I still try to find info on this”.

“I didn’t get the feeling it was “Alien” when I saw it. But I just don’t think we had that technology? And as I said before I live in Little Rock Arkansas, so I don’t know why something like that would be here. Anyway I know what I saw. I can say since that day I have a different perspective on things like this”.

 

What do you think their purpose is — do you think the reason for the drones being in our skies is good or bad?

 

“Since I saw what I did last year it has had an affect on me —I’m not saying life changing, but more of trying to find out exactly what it was and what is it’s purpose.  That’s what has really kept me wondering all this time. I do know when I was watching this thing go over me I was thinking to myself — I don’t think I’m supposed to be seeing this!  I do now think, are these things everywhere and people just don’t know it? And if so, how long have they been up there? Why was it so close to the treeline? Are they collecting information? If so, why? Can they see inside homes? Are they just testing top secret craft? Who are they? Scientist? Military? All of these are my thoughts. I go back and forth on good or bad intent.”

 

“They basically wanted us to turn these artefacts into something they could patent and sell. One of C.A.R.E.T.’s most appealing promises was the revenue generated by these product-ready technologies, which could be funnelled right back into black projects.” – Isaac

 

Previous Related Sightings – November 2007 June 2003

 

I think it’s important not to take Mike’s sighting in isolation, but to perhaps look at it in a much wider context.

 

This is by no means the first sighting of a Dragonfly Drone in this part of continental United States.  In 2007, Melody McIver, a resident of Van Buren, Arkansas described how both she and her sister had individual sightings, but spaced four years apart. Melody had her sighting on November 19th 2007 when she witnessed one of these Dragonfly Drones hovering over a business close to where she worked — it’s worth noting that just like Mike, she too identified the craft in Ty B’s photograph as the closest match to what she saw.

 

Meanwhile Melody’s sister “Jane”, who lives about 90 miles away in Hartshorne Oklahoma, had two sightings in the same week in 2003,  both while standing on her porch.

 

“The day was warm and I went out on my porch. I saw what I thought was an airplane. But then, the strange thing got closer and closer and had all kinds of arms and legs on it and spirally things (top wires going up into the air) and lights all over it. And it had writing on it that looked like a foreign language. Then, it just kind of hovered. It didn’t like fly – it just hovered. It stayed in the same spot for several hours. Then I went inside. And I saw it again a couple of days later, but it was in the evening. I don’t remember what time in the evening. It was doing the same thing and it was around the same area. And it just kind of hovers”.

“But their technology is different. It really did operate like the magical piece of paper sitting on a table, in a manner of speaking. They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of field. The language, a term I am still using very loosely, is a system of symbols (which does admittedly very much resemble a written language) along with geometric forms and patterns that fit together to form diagrams that are themselves functional.” – Isaac

 

One of the PACL documents featuring the strange symbol language and constructs capable of self-activation.

One of the PACL documents featuring the strange symbol language and constructs capable of self-activation.

Geographic Link

 

If you include my new witness Mike, then that makes a total of four separate sightings in the relatively small Fort Smith / Little Rock area. It’s a high concentration of sightings in a relatively small geographic location and there are some comparisons with the wave of California drone sightings in 2006-2007.  The area around Little Rock and further afield appears to be a Dragonfly Drone ‘hotspot’ just as in and around Saratoga, California was in 2006 / 2007.

 

 

State Forest Links

 

What’s especially curious is that a significant proportion of sightings in California have occurred either close to, or inside state forests, and with Mike’s sighting in Little Rock we now have the makings of another drone hotspot— again occurring around yet another state forested area.

 

The Ouachita National Forest lies in the western portion of Arkansas and portions of eastern Oklahoma. It covers 1.8 million acres in central Arkansas and south-eastern Oklahoma and is managed by the USDA Forest Service for multiple uses, including timber and wood production, watershed protection and improvement. It is one of the largest state forests in the United States and in terms of sheer size it ranks 27th largest out of 177 with a land mass greater than the state of Delaware. Source Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States_National_Forests

 

The ckuster of dragonfly drone sightings around the Ouachita State Forest

The cluster of dragonfly drone sightings around the Ouachita State Forest

 

I can’t help thinking about the many sightings from 2006-2007 that took place in or close to State Forests.  One in particular stands out – and that is the sighting in Sequoia National Park in 2005 by witness Shirley, who stopped to ask a Park Ranger directions, and while they were chatting, a drone craft moved slowly over the trees.

 

“We were preparing to leave the park and we were a bit confused as to which road to take to get out of the park and back on a main road heading home. We made a couple of stops to ask directions: first with a park ranger and again later from one of the road repair crews. As I was getting directions from the park ranger this WEIRD THING flew overhead, going at a nice, leisurely pace and reminding me of a dragonfly! I asked the park ranger: “WHAT was THAT?!” to which he replied:
“I’m told it’s some kind of a communications device that’s supposed to help the park service monitor the area for potential problems-stuff like fires and such.” I joked: “So it’s NOT a UFO?’ to which he kind of chuckled and casually said: “a! Nah, I don’t think so!” He was just so CASUAL about the whole thing that I really didn’t give it much thought at the time, and I’d almost FORGOT about it until I read that story posted by a “Chad”. My dad (who was up in his late eighties at that time) never saw it, but I AGAIN spotted it off in the distance as we got directions from the road crew”. — Shirley

 

The witness was puzzled, but the park ranger didn’t seem phased – he explained it away with casual ease. It all probability he was not a Park Ranger at all, but that he was associated with monitoring / observing the drones in some way – and dressed as such so he would blend in.

A map of continental United States showing the Dragonfly Drone sightings from 1981 to 2015

A map of continental United States showing the Dragonfly Drone sightings from 1981 to 2015

So what exactly are the drones fascination with forests and trees — why are they so frequently sighted in these places? If they can cloak themselves then using trees for ‘cover’ makes no sense. If, as has been previously hypothesized, some secret branch of our govt is trying to jam the drones’ ability to cloak themselves then perhaps staying low and close to trees and power poles somehow shields them from disruption / jamming signals?   Perhaps the trees and the environment are being studied as other witnesses have previously suggested — or are the drones primarily based and operated from underground facilities deep within these areas of state forest? We can only speculate as to the reason at this point.

 

Ours or ‘Theirs’?

 

I’ve had a long time to think about this and it’s an interesting discussion as there are solid arguments for BOTH points of view.  There is no doubt in my mind that the original technology and most, if not all, of what has been seen by eye-witnesses over the years is non-human in origin, but there is a strong likelihood that we too have reproduced our own version/s. From Isaac’s information leak we know that there was a project to back-engineer the original tech. Then we have the testimony of the 1987 witness who saw the same drone technology close-up in a hangar at an air-show in Barksdale Air-force Base.

 

“I saw this thing in a hangar at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, at one of the open house air shows around twenty or so years ago (1987?). It was a static display (mounted on a dolly or cart), and there were people around it (that is, some visitors to the air show). It was a display by some major aerospace contractor. I forget who. A number of us had wandered into the open hangar and were just standing there, looking at it, and at some of the other displays (some air-to-air missiles, I think). There were about three or four hangars with public displays, and this one, or so we all thought, was one of them.

 

I do have a vague recollection of somebody ‘official’ coming out there and telling a couple of the Air Force guys that the unit wasn’t supposed to be out on PUBLIC display (i.e., apparently it was meant for display to MILITARY PERSONNEL ONLY), and that they needed to get it put out of sight. The military guys then ran everybody (including me) out of the hangar, and closed the doors. There was even a brochure, but I recall only that I may have picked it up briefly and looked at it, then put it back down. It had an artist’s rendering of the unit on display. Unfortunately, I don’t have the brochure. I don’t remember what the thing was called, but it was some kind of surveillance or intelligence gathering drone. I wasn’t that interested in it at the time, just idly curious. (It might have been some sort of ‘concept development’ at that time, and maybe didn’t even work yet. I don’t recall.)” – Barksdale AFB witness, 1987

 

Drone Disinformation Campaign

 

In 2006 / 2007 when the news of the drones became widespread, it seemed to become necessary for those keeping the information to downplay and discredit what the public had witnessed.

 

And as anyone who has any experience of the campaign of denial knows — when it comes to information leaks the sheer volume of agency and other black world sponsored disinformation tactics that surround the UFO / non-human contact phenomenon is utterly staggering.

 

The overall objective of those protecting the information is to dilute and obfuscate any small nuggets of genuine disclosure that do miraculously break the surface of the quagmire of crapola and get out into the public domain. So in an attempt to control the information where genuine sightings of craft of an unknown origin are taken seriously, there are many underhand techniques employed by those who would rather we know precisely nothing.

 

Methods of Disinformation

 

Ladies and gentlemen, I submit to you that the information to emerge from the PACL facility and the ongoing sightings spanning more than three decades are entirely genuine and that this was one such nugget of unwanted disclosure that despite containment efforts, did manage to break the surface.

 

It’s a pretty simple equation — the amount of genuine information to seep out of the Dragonfly Drone drone program can be directly measured against the level and intensity of the frantic disinformation efforts occurring at that time.  For example, during the wave of sightings around 2006 – 2007 when the drone sightings were at their peak, the online campaign to discredit witnesses and debunk the truth of the existence of the drones was unrelenting and also quite frankly – blatantly obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence.  Disinformation campaigns are rolled out and executed in accordance with unexpected disclosure events like this. They frequently involve multiple avenues of counter-intelligence efforts and are often focused on attempting to ridicule and discredit genuine witness accounts.

 

There appear to have been two distinct concerns here.  The concealment of the fact that there was a frustrating, but eventually successful, human driven ‘extraction’ program to back-engineer and replicate the drone tech, and secondly, the concealment of the fact that there was at least one parallel non-human originated program. Both that these programs existed, and more importantly, that they were, and still are, ongoing to this day.

 

In the case of the Dragonfly Drones, ‘they’ (agencies unknown and those protecting the truth of the drone presence here on Earth) went to a whole heap of trouble in their discrediting efforts. This involved creating and releasing multiple hoaxed CGI drone videos which were extremely unconvincing. They went to the trouble of setting up websites to try and convince a now intrigued public that the drones were just a marketing stunt or an outright hoax.  ‘They’ also heavily utilised the services of bought and paid for trolls whose job it was to create confusion by interlacing the story with more falsehoods and layers of misdirection.

 

These trolls have been, and still are, embedded deep within the UFO subculture. They operate within forums, blogs, social media as well as the traditional print media, radio and television. They conduct counter-intelligence efforts using every available avenue. These targeted and sustained campaigns to obfuscate the truth have been going on for a long long time and no doubt some of the perpetrators of spin have created a veil of respectability within their own sphere of influence such that they would never be accused of perpetrating disinformation.

 

Fortunately when it comes to the Dragonfly Drones, the sheer volume and variety of independent eyewitness accounts spanning THIRTY-FOUR YEARS and crossing all social groups, locations and ages means that there is now zero chance of any disinfo campaign succeeding. I challenge any rational person to properly immerse themselves in the sea of evidence, read the ever-growing stack of eyewitness accounts and listen to the hours of testimony from so many people, from so many walks of life and then simply dismiss it a hoax.

 

Quite simply, in the case of the Dragonfly Drones, the information containment effort failed.

 

 

Conclusion

 

To the best of our knowledge these otherworldly drones have been seen in our skies now for more than three decades – and who knows, perhaps they’ve been there, observing humankind for a long long time before we ever became aware of their presence.

 

Although the original technology Isaac described is of non-human origin, it appears the PACL project may have been successful in its replication efforts and some, not all, may be owned and operated by human intelligence. If so, it is hard to imagine that these occasional forays into populated suburban areas would ever be sanctioned by anyone in their right mind, such is the potential risk of detection. Perhaps then, the incidences of public sightings are primarily of non-human control.

 

The drones are using a propulsion system that is not recognisable by any known conventional physics – a sort of highly developed electrogravitic system similar to the ‘Biefeld-Brown Effect’. They have the ability to ‘hover’ and glide through the air silently, despite having zero aerodynamic qualities that would enable flight as we would recognise it. They also have the ability to cloak themselves while observing our environment with nearly 100% impunity.

 

In my last report from 2014 I noted that there had been no new reported sightings since 2008. It very much appeared by the time 2012 had come around that we had probably heard the last of the drone reports. We now know that given this new sighting from 2015 – that the Dragonfly Drone phenomenon is still very much alive and well.

 

So those confronting questions remain. What purpose do these drones serve, and is their motive here on our planet for good or bad?  Just how long have they been closely observing us and who or what is controlling them?

 

We must now ponder a potentially chilling scenario. That these ever-present silent surveyors in our skies are the far-reaching exploratory tendrils of some other-worldly intelligence conducting strategic reconnaissance on our planet and that perhaps both we and our Earth have been the subject of this unsettling covert surveillance for a very long time indeed and for reasons yet unknown.

 

What information do YOU have on these Dragonfly Drones?

 

I am immensely grateful to Mike for having the courage to share his experience.  Only by new witnesses telling their story do we stand a chance of finding out what these things are, what their purpose is, and WHO or what is controlling them?  I am interested to hear from you if you’ve had your own sighting or if you have any information relating to the drones?

 

Did you work at the Palo Alto C.A.R.E.T Laboratory or do you know Isaac?  Perhaps you have photos or footage of these drones or other unexplained objects similar to this? Have you been keeping information on this subject to yourself for some time and now want to share it?  Have you seen the strange hieroglyphic symbol language before? I’d also like to hear from you if you were one of the original witnesses from 2006 – 2007. I encourage you to contact me with any information you may think is relevant.

 

All requests for confidentiality are honored and treated in the strictest confidence.

 

You can reach me at truthfall@truthfall.com – or private message through my Dragonfly Drones Facebook Page

 

Further Reading & Research

 

Exclusive: Dragonfly Drone Winess / MUFON / ISAAC – Real Prometheus Connection

http://truthfall.com/exclusive-dragonfly-drone-witness-mufon-isaac-real-prometheus-connection/

Read Isaac’s original whsitleblower testimony on the C.A.R.E.T program.

http://droneteam.com/isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/index.html

Drone Eyewitness Podcasts by Linda Moulton-Howe

Earthfiles Dragonfly Drone podcast episodes 17, 18, 19, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 47.

http://www.earthfiles333.com

Wiki Drone Site & Forum

http://www.droneteam.com

CARET Dragonfly Drones – Lake Tahoe Sighting

http://truthfall.com/caret-dragonfly-drones-lake-tahoe-sighting/

Weird Dragonfly Aerial Drones – The Chad Photos

http://truthfall.com/weird-dragonfly-aerial-drones-the-chad-photos/

 

EXCLUSIVE: Dragonfly Drone Witness, MUFON & Isaac – Real Prometheus Connection?

Posted on May 1, 2014

Today, and for the first time in many years I can share revealing new witness testimony in the search for truth behind the mysterious dragonfly drone sightings which came to prevalence in May 2006 and peaked in 2007 with more than a dozen witnesses in geographically separate parts of the United States and further afield reported seeing, and photographing strange dragonfly drone-like aerial objects in broad daylight.

Initially reported as Bakersfield - the location was later identified as just off Highway 17, near the restaurant known as behind the the  “Summit Snack Shack” or “Summit Roadhouse” as it was later renamed, which at this point runs parallel to the old Santa Cruz Highway approx 4-7 miles south of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County, California.

Location initially reported as Bakersfield – the ‘actual’ location was later identified as just off Highway 17, near the restaurant known as the “Summit Snack Shack” or “Summit Roadhouse” as it was later renamed, which at this point runs parallel to the old Santa Cruz Highway approx 4-7 miles south of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County, California.

“I walked back across the room to look outside to see what had caused the shadow, and there was THIS thing! It was not moving, not making a sound, just…there. I just stood there for a few seconds to try to wrap my head around what I was seeing…what WAS I seeing?

 

Special report by Truthfall editor -  Craig Brown

 

Newly identified witness who saw and photographed back engineered ET dragonfly drone was contacted by C.A.R.E.T. whistle-blower Isaac. Not only that, but her sighting dates back to 1981;  a full 6 years before the earliest known sighting to date – previously the earliest known sighting was in 1987, when an eyewitness touring an air show at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana wandered into the wrong hangar and saw one of these dragonfly-shaped craft supposedly setup as some sort of  display exhibit – before being hurriedly ushered out by military personnel. C.A.R.E.T is an acronym for (Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology) a classified special access project where Isaac claimed he worked for 3 years.

  • New Witness Testimony Reveals Earliest Known Public Sighting So Far – 1981
  • Isaac (C.A.R.E.T) Somehow Knew and Made Contact with Witness Soon After She Submitted Her Photo to MUFON.
  • Isaac – Similar CARET Symbol Language Rumoured To Be Found In A 10,000 yr old Cave.
  • Isaac’s Contact With This New Witness Pre-dates his Webpage Disclosure of June, 2007 by 15 years!
  • Photo Witness Took is Eerily Similar to One Taken by ‘Rajman1977′ -  Rajman 1977 Photo Directly Below.
  • Like Many Other Witnesses Craft Was Again Sighted Over Top of Suburban Power Pole.
Photo taken by 'Rajman'. Claimed to be taken in Capitola but actually traced to Campbell.

Photo taken in May 2007 by ‘Rajman1977′ – . Claimed to be taken in Capitola but the pole location was actually traced to Campbell.

 

Background to The Story

 

More than a dozen witnesses from 1987 to 2008 have described encounters with objects having a “ring body”, “appendages”, and a ‘tail’  or “boom” like protuberance. The craft were described as stationery or very slow moving, usually silent, emitting no sound except for maybe a static, crackling, or sound of high voltage electricity usually accompanied by the feeling of a static charge in the air.  Most of the witnesses have observed and photographed these strange craft as they hovered above trees or power poles for reasons yet unknown. Some have been observed in silently hovering above power poles in suburban streets and others slowly skimming or rotating over the tops of tress in forested areas.

 

Isaac & PACL

 

Around the same time as the sightings began getting widespread attention in June 2007, a webpage appeared written by someone calling himself Isaac. Isaac freely admitted he was using a pseudo-name to protect his identity as a whistle-blower. On the webpage was published a cache of  allegedly leaked documents and photographs from a highly secretive project based in Palo Alto, California. Isaac claimed he could identify the strange craft the witnesses were seeing as he had worked on them as part of a classified project he had been a part of. That project was named C.A.R.E.T – Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology. An archive copy of the original Isaac webpage can be found here.

 

Commercialise Non-Human Technology

 

According to Isaac – the idea behind the C.A.R.E.T project was to take retrieved technology of non-human origin and figure out how it worked so that it could be back engineered into commercially viable products and technologies which would ultimately be for public consumption.  During Isaac’s time there from 1984-1987, neither he nor the many other scientists working there were ever told where the technology they worked on originated from – except that it was non-human in origin. Isaac and the other scientists worked on their own or in very small groups like any secure compartmentalised project of this nature, but eventually the lack of background information on the items they were given to work with led to a lot of frustration with their less than communicative military project bosses.

 

Outside, the CA.R.E.T project building looked like any other modern technology or computer facility in Silicon Valley, except that once inside there was said to be extremely high security with “enough armed guards to invade Poland” – with the building going several levels underground. Among the documents successfully smuggled out and leaked by Isaac were many photographs of what appear to be parts of these dragonfly craft, and other documents describing the strange symbol language, along with the main document of interest which was titled the ‘Q4-86 Research Report’ – which would presume that these reports were written quarterly on an ongoing basis.

The reason given by Isaac that he was now choosing to come forward and release this information is that he recognized the dragonfly drones in the witness reports and photos as the same technology he worked with at the Palo Alto C.A.R.E.T facility.

 

Four advanced (presumably extraterrestrial) technologies being worked on were mentioned in the C.A.R.E.T Q4-86 Research Report document.

  1. Personal Anti-Gravity Generator.
  2. Three Dimensional Image Recorder Projector.
  3. A complex system of symbols and geometric constructs capable of both defining the functionality of artifacts as well as manipulating their behaviour, crudely analogous to a computer programming language, but without the need for a compilation / interpretation phase.
  4. Item 4 – had been blacked out and was unreadable.

“I’ve heard from a lot of friends that there are multiple sites like PACL in Sunnyvale and Mountain View, also disguised to look like unremarkable office space.” – Isaac

Photo one of many taken by "Chad". Location was later identified as back of restaurant / diner off the highway near Los Gatos.

Photo one of many taken by “Chad”. Location was later identified as back of restaurant / diner off highway 7 near Los Gatos.

Witnesses from 2006-2008

 

Ground-breaking investigative news site Earthfiles.com, written by Linda Moulton-Howe began covering the ever evolving story as one after one, new witnesses, new testimony and new photos  of the weird dragonfly drones were reported all over the United States from Capitola, Big Basin, Bakersfield, California, Birmingham, Alabama, Arizona, Ohio and others.

Linda had taken to calling them dragonfly drones since witnesses described their strange movement much like a dragonfly would move and that the bodies of the craft were described as only a maximum of two feet thick and therefore not capable of being piloted by humans, but rather they appeared to be being remotely piloted or controlled by some other means. The phrase “Dragonfly Drones” was born.

 

  • Ring Body With A Tall Circular Crown of Wires On Top Pointing Upward
  • White / Grey / Metallic Body
  • Flat “Wing” or “Boom” / Projection Broken Into Sections Leading Out From Ring Body
  • Weird Hieroglyphic Symbols On Bottom Of Craft
  • Slow Moving / Can Hover Silently / Move Like A Dragonfly
  • Photographed at Tree Top Level Usually / Near Power Poles
  • Have Been Known to React To Torchlight Shined On Them
  • Witnesses Feel the Drones are Observing / Collecting Information / Engaged in Surveillance

 

New Information

 

In an effort to seek out new witnesses to this phenomena, last year I wrote two articles based on the existing historical accounts in the hope that this may jog someone’s memory or be the catalyst for bringing new information to light and advance what seems to be a UFO cold case.  Part of the effort to re-investigate the story involved the creation of a Facebook Page which would serve as a web-presence and point of contact for those who may wish to come forward or present information relating to this phenomena.

 

New Witness

 

Almost one full year has passed with no serious contacts resulting from the page – that is until very recently when a brand new witness contacted me.

 

My new witness has kept her story private among her close family for over THIRTY YEARS but now she feels able to share her fascinating account;  She is concerned for her privacy due to the circumstances and nature of what she witnessed and understandably does not want any press intrusion or harassment. Therefore, to protect her real identity we will call her ‘Mary’.

 

Mary is 58 years old and was born in Detroit, Michigan. Her father was an engineer for the big three auto corps (General Motors, Ford & Chrysler), while her mother stayed home. After her parents divorce in the 1970′s,  her mother moved to Phoenix, Arizona. Mary has been teaching art for 30 years and now lives  in S.E. Michigan.

 

I should add that I have verified Mary’s real name, address, telephone number and other details confirming her identity and background.

 

Mary’s sighting of the drone took place over 30 years ago in 1981, however Mary kept the story between close family for more than a decade, that is until she had a separate UFO sighting of a silver disc in 1991/92.  When Mary reported the silver disc sighting to MUFON, she also happened to report her drone sighting, albeit from 10 years previous.  Several months after making the report to MUFON she was contacted out of the blue by someone called Isaac whom she did not know. This contact with Mary was made a full 16 years BEFORE Isaac published the leaked documents on the internet.

 

Here for the first time in over thirty years, Mary shares the story of her encounter with a strange dragonfly drone and her subsequent interaction with C.A.R.E.T whistleblower – Isaac.

 

How did you find the dragonfly drone Facebook page?

 

“..one day a thing came up on my Facebook feed about Dragonfly drones, and when I clicked on it, I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw my photo (or so I thought), at the top of your page.  Since I had given the photo to MUFON years ago,  I assumed it had circulated to some point, and I even heard there was a photo similar to mine on a TV show.”

 

I guess I should start by asking you to take some time and describe in as much detail as you can, your recollection of the circumstances around your sighting of the weird dragonfly craft.

 

“I remember very clearly this day.  It was an apartment building in Phoenix at the base of Camelback mountain. I have no idea if it still exists, or the name.  It was my mother’s apartment, and she died at age 48 of cancer in 1984.”

 

“I was visiting with my husband from Michigan; we had arrived the day prior to the day I took this photo.  It was January 1981 (I am sure on the year, fuzzy on the month) …my age in 1981 would have been 25.  Anyway, my mother gave us her room to sleep in….the apt was on the first floor.”

 

Shadow

 

“After dinner (approx 4 or 5pm), we were going to play cards.  My mother asked me to get her a pack of cigarettes from the carton in the top drawer of her dresser.  As I went into the room, I noticed that she did not have a screen on the window, and it was open slightly -  (It was a sliding window that moved left to right).  I got the pack of cigarettes, and started to turn to exit the room, when a I saw a shadow pass over her bed from something large outside.”

 

“I walked back across the room to look outside to see what had caused the shadow, and there was THIS thing!  It was not moving, not making a sound; just …there.”

 

“I just stood there for a few seconds to try to wrap my head around what I was seeing…what WAS I seeing?  Then, I remembered my camera on the top of the dresser! I quickly grabbed it, and snapped this picture.  I ran to the dining room with the camera and announced that we needed to go to the photo store right away to get this developed, because they were not going to believe what I just saw.  My mother, her boyfriend, my husband and I all ran back to my mother’s bedroom window,  and it was gone.”

 

“The object out the window was above the telephone pole as you see in my photo.  I was on the ground floor.  It did not make a sound, I thought for a moment it was some kind of weird kite.  It had strange characters on the “boom” that stuck out.”

 

Editor’s Note: The photo above showing the dragonfly drone hovering above the power pole was not taken by Mary, but was taken in 2007 and was later identified as a location in Campbell, not Capitola as originally specified by witness ‘Rajman’. It became apparent during my discussions with Mary that her original sighting and photo (taken in 1981 in Phoenix) was so eerily similar to Rajman’s photo that she had just assumed it was hers – she freely acknowledges the close similarity.

 

Symbol Language

 

During Isaac’s time at C.A.R.E.T one of the most fascinating aspects of his job was working with the strange symbol ‘language’ that was central to the operation of many of the non-human artifacts. Mary told me she had memorised two of the most prominent ‘characters’ or symbols of this language from her original photo and, as she is an artist, she felt compelled to re-create them in a patch for her purse.

 

I asked Mary about the symbols on her purse.

“I have some of these characters in a beaded patch that I wear on my purse.  I did the bead-work patch myself from the email I printed.  I have removed it re-sewed it onto each new purse. I keep hoping that somewhere, someday, someone will ask me where I got them.”

Mary's beaded patch featuring CARET lettering sewn onto her purse.

Mary’s beaded patch featuring CARET lettering sewn onto her purse.

Editor’s Note:  I asked Mary if she could take a photo of the symbols on her purse and send them to me – and she sent me the image above. Upon closer examination – the symbols in Mary’s patch appear to be the two prominent symbols found in one of the PACL documents smuggled out and posted by Isaac – image below. These symbols also appear on the underside of the craft’s “boom” or extended “arm”.

 

Two symbols or 'letters' featured in PACL documents.

Two very prominent symbols or ‘letters’ featured in PACL documents.

 

Tell me about the photo of the dragonfly drone you took out of your mother’s apartment window in Phoenix.

 

Mary“It was taken on an Instamatic Camera.  I kept that photo in a safe for many years, only showing it to a few people.”

 

Burned

 

“I remember when I showed the photo to my then husband, he wanted to take it to the local newspaper, and I flatly refused after the hubbub that I had experienced from the MIB visit a few years prior…my mother wanted to move from her apartment, she said she was frightened.  Her husband thought it was cool, and agreed with my husband.   I tucked it away in a book and left it there.  When I left my husband, he was angry enough to burn everything I owned.”

Camelback Mountain - Phoenix, Arizona. The location of Mary's 1981 sighting of a dragonfly drone.

Camelback Mountain – Phoenix, Arizona. The location of Mary’s 1981 sighting of a dragonfly drone.

“As far as the photo, [On the CARET Facebook Page] it really freaks me out how identical they are, and I am now wondering if in my transfer from computer to computer to computer,that at some point, I copied the wrong one onto my hard drive.  I had several of these photos I had grabbed off the internet that looked similar to mine back in the early 1990′s and put them on a thumb drive.  I only saved the one I thought was mine.  I have no way of knowing now… That said, I did study that photo many many times,  I wrote the characters over and over (the ones I could make out) and compared them to the ones in the cave drawing that Isaac had sent.  I took the clearest ones and made a beaded patch. The one on my purse.”

Photo by 'Chad" as strange dragonfly craft 'flew' overhead.

Photo by ‘Chad” as strange dragonfly craft ‘flew’ overhead.

‘Isaac’ was the pseudo-name for the whistle-blower who smuggled documents, photographs and other papers out of the C.A.R.E.T facility in Palo Alto, California. Now you mentioned you were contacted by Isaac – what did he tell you?

 

“Isaac began his email by saying he was writing to let me know that the object I had seen was not alien, but made in the USA. He told me first off that I should not be afraid of alien UFO’s, as the item I had taken a picture of was made right here in the USA.. Isaac told me first that I would only hear from this this one time…he was only writing to me once, and that the email was temporary and would not be replied to.”

 

“He also asked me to please delete the email after I had read it.  Which I did after I had printed it  – (I think I printed it, or part of it, so I will look through my old papers to see if I can find it).  As I stated prior, when I received the email from Isaac, I had assumed that he contacted me as a result of my correspondence with MUFON, which was only a few weeks before.  I had no idea who he was, or even if he was for real, but his email was so detailed that I also assumed he was who he said he was.”

 

“He indicated that he, along with a few other men, had been approached by the US government somewhere in California, and asked to find a commercial use for some “technologies” they were in possession of.”

 

“Each man was searched when they came in, and searched again when they left each day. He said each man was in a cubicle of his own to study and find a commercial use for the item he was given. Isaac said that they were never told where these items came from, only that they were being paid to find a commercial use for it. Isaac said the items he was given (I printed a picture of that too) were curved pieces of metal with strange characters on them.”

 

Clear Jello

 

“I cannot remember whether they told him what it did, or if he discovered it, but he said the characters had to be on this metal, in this order, and in a particular electromagnetic field, they cloaked themselves. He said it worked by bending light. He said that the thing I had taken a picture of was simply malfunctioning, and that is why I saw part of it for a moment. He said it worked on the rods and cones in our eyes,in that it bent light. He said some animals could still see them, but if working properly, they would be nearly invisible. He called it “clear jello”.

 

Cloaked

 

“From what I gathered in my email correspondence from Isaac, he indicated that I was seeing them only because they were being tested by the U.S. and, had they been working properly, I would never have seen it.  He said some folks only see the boom or the cage, due to a malfunction of the apparatus that bends light around it; he said that is why sometimes we will swear we just saw something in the air, then suddenly it is gone. He also indicated that dogs may be able to see them even as cloaked, and when we look at what they are barking at, we see nothing.”

Leaked photographs from the Q4-86 Research Document showing non-human technology with symbols etched into the 'metal'.

Leaked photographs from the Q4-86 Research Document showing alleged non-human technology with symbols etched into the ‘metal’.

“Remember,  Isaac stated that he was given a technology that came from who-knows-where, and was told to find a commercial purpose for it. And, he was with other men who had other advanced technologies in cubicles next to him who were told to do the same with what they were given.  So who knows where this came from, or what the other men had.   All I know is that Issac said these were made here…but that does not hint at the origin of the original.”

Non-human artifacts in a leaked photograph from the C.A.R.E.T Q4-86 Research document obtained by whistleblower 'Isaac'.

Non-human artifacts in a leaked photograph from the C.A.R.E.T Q4-86 Research document obtained by whistleblower ‘Isaac’.

 

Ancient Cave Symbols

 

“I hope I can find the stuff I printed, because he said a lot more, but I can’t remember. I remember he said there were some symbols nearly identical to them in an ancient 10,000 year old cave somewhere, but it was over my head in techno details. I never heard from him again.”

 

So how long after your contact with MUFON did Isaac get in touch with you?

 

“I think it was approximately 3 months after I reported the disc and the drone to MUFON that I received the email from Isaac; and just assumed it was a direct result of my report. Perhaps it was, but who knows? I got introduced [to Isaac] by way (or so I thought) from MUFON,  I had sent them the picture, and a short time later, this Isaac emailed me and referred to the picture I had sent MUFON. Other than that, I am clueless.”

 

It would be amazing if you could find his original email and especially the cave drawing that you mentioned. On a separate note, one of the previous witnesses mentioned that a book he had obtained at his local library contained references to the word “Oltissus ” and soon after two guys showed up and confiscated the book under the Patriot Act. Does the word Oltissis mean anything to you or did Isaac mention anything in relation to Oltissis or the book “Ancient Greek Gods and Lore Revisited”?

 

“No, I have never heard “Oltissis”.

 

You mentioned earlier, you had an visit years before from some MIB, can you tell me about that?

 

“At age 14, after reading in National Geographic about the earth and sea cores that had been dug up in Greenland or somewhere very cold, they had discovered tropical seed pods in the frozen material many feet down. The article went on to say something about a dramatic and sudden change in temperature at some point.  I wrote a story about what I thought this meant, and wrote to NASA for more details. They never responded, but I wrote my story anyway and sent it to them.”

 

“Five years later, some “men in black” paid me a visit wanting to know where I had gotten all the information for the story I wrote.  I laughed and told them that it was part my imagination, and part the National Geographic magazine, I could not believe what they were asking! They even recorded it! My mother walked in from outdoors to see this man sitting in her living room audio taping her daughter (second guy in black was waiting in the car) and wanted to know what the bloody hell I had done, I asked them to tell her, and she laughed out loud.”

 

“They asked her if she still had the article from National Geographic, and she leaned in and said “No, but I’m relatively sure if you call them, they can help you”.  I laughed myself silly as the MIB hurried out the door. But then, why were they there? Had I stumbled upon something? My story simply was about a theory of how we possibly had advanced technology before….90,000 years ago, and how we wiped ourselves out. (Possibly more than once.) But heck, I was just a 14 yr old kid…”

 

 “They basically wanted us to turn these artifacts into something they could patent and sell. One of C.A.R.E.T.’s most appealing promises was the revenue generated by these product-ready technologies, which could be funneled right back into black projects.” – Isaac

 

You had the drone encounter in 1981, then 10 years later in 1991/92 you saw a ‘silver disc’ in a separate unconnected sighting and this was the sighting (along with the drone sighting 10 years previous) that was the catalyst for making a report to MUFON. Tell me about that.

 

“In 1991 or 1992, while I was driving home one summer day in Livingston/Genessee county in Michigan,  I saw something else and this time reported it to MUFON.  I was traveling north on Argentine Road through a farming community, in an Escort wagon.

 

“My 9 year old daughter was in the passenger seat, and my 13 yr old step-daughter was in the back seat. We had traveled approx 3 miles, when my step-daughter said “What is that?”, as she looked to the East. I could not see what she was looking at. My daughter then exclaimed “Seriously Mom, stop the car, what IS that?”,  I leaned down to see what they were referring to, and approx 1/2 mile to the East, directly above the treelike, was an enormous silver disk.”

 

“We pulled over and marveled at it;  it was stationary,  and bright as a mirror – (hard to look at for long).  As we were taking this remarkable sight in,  it suddenly zipped off to the north at an incredible rate of speed.  I told the girls to get in the car,  and raced north to see if I could catch it. – (it is an old paved farm road, and has very little traffic).  I lost sight of it right away, and slowed down approx another mile up the road.”

 

“When I had traveled another 7-8 miles, I could see something ahead blocking the two-lane road; it was a group of people. We pulled over and approached the 40-50 people milling about in the roadway, who were looking in the direction I had seen this disk, and they were looking south. One of them was a police officer. In his hand, he had a walkie-talkie, and apparently, there was another man with a walkie-talkie 10 miles to the south on this road, and these men had been watching and clocking this thing for over an hour.”

 

“I heard him say they had clocked it at 4000 MPH. I had to go home to let my dogs out, so I could not stay, but never heard a peep about this anywhere. When I finally contacted MUFON, and told them about this disc, and sent them the attached photo, [THE PHOTO OF THE DRONE OUTSIDE THE APT] -  about a week later a man who identified himself as Isaac emailed me. The story he told me blew my mind.”

 

“There are a lot of things we do not know………”

 

It’s odd that after you sent your photo to MUFON that Isaac then emails you? How do you suppose he got your details?

 

“I guess I thought MUFON and he knew each other…I had not told anyone outside of a few trusted friends about this…”

 

Do you remember the name of the MUFON person you made your initial report to and did they ever lodge a formal case ID?

 

“I am just a normal,everyday person. I do not watch the skies, or see weird things generally. I just was so mad that no one would listen to me about that giant silver disc, that I wanted someone to acknowledge what we had all seen, and contacted MUFON, and it kind of went from there. I do not know whom I spoke to at MUFON, but they should have record of it, they asked me for more details about it.”

 

He told me first off that I should not be afraid of alien UFO’s, as the item I had taken a picture of was made right here in the USA.

 

Isaac’s History of Contacting Witnesses

 

At first I wondered why Isaac may have contacted Mary and no-one else, however, in the process of researching this article I noted that in his statement made in 2007,(reprinted below) Isaac had voiced intent to contact other witnesses. I now realise there is a real possibility he may have had dialogue over the years with MANY people about this topic and indeed it is likely he had other communications with first-hand witnesses  – assuming he managed to acquire their contact details.

 

“I am also trying to get in touch with the witnesses so far, such as Chad, Rajman, Jenna, Ty, and the Lake Tahoe witness (especially Chad). I have advice for them that may be somewhat helpful in dealing with what they’ve seen and what I would recommend they do with what they know. If you are one of these witnesses, or can put me in touch with them, please contact Coast to Coast AM and let them know. ” – Isaac, June 2007

 

It appears that Isaac had “advice” too for Mary when in 1991/92 he was compelled to write her an email explaining her bizarre sighting was part govt / part non-human technology.

 

MUFON Connection?

 

So just how did Isaac get to find out about Mary and her photograph?  Did Isaac work directly with MUFON in some capacity, or was Isaac already in touch with an insider in MUFON who then passed Mary’s contact details on to him?

 

Real Life Prometheus

 

Many of you will be familiar with the movie Prometheus where weird symbols found in an ancient cave tell of millenia of non-human involvement in the human race and a link to our mysterious origins.

 

When Mary told me of Isaac’s drawing of the weird symbols found on the craft to symbols found in an ancient cave it resonated that perhaps the true makers of this technology may have been with us for a VERY long time indeed.

Editor’s note: I spent time looking for ancient glyphs and cave symbols in an effort to trace the cave that Isaac refers to in his communication with Mary, however my search so far has been fruitless.  I am asking now, if anyone out there reading this now knows of or can locate similar symbols to the C.A.R.E.T ‘language’ then please contact me.

Mary is going to try and locate the cave drawing and Isaac’s email printout from storage and hopefully, if so I will follow up on this with another article.

 

Military

 

Arizona is home to a whole raft of military installations including Fort Huachuca, Yuma Proving Ground, Camp Navajo, and in Phoenix itself there is the the Barry M Goldwater Bombing Range, and Luke Air Force Base, which is only 28 miles from Camelback Mountain – is there a military connection here?

 

Drone Reports Now Span 33 Years

 

Up until this point it had previously been thought that the earliest known sighting of one of these strange craft was by a witness who by chance observed one as some sort of exhibit in a hanger at an Air show at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.  The information from Mary now points to the fact that these things have been operational and deployed in public places now since at least 1981.  Whether the drone that Mary witnessed was military back engineered or non-human in origin, it now seems likely that there are dozens or potentially hundreds more witnesses spanning over the last 33 years at least.

 

What purpose do these drones serve? Who owns and operates them, and as there have been no recorded sightings since 2008 – are we to infer that they are no longer in use, or more chillingly, that they have perfected their defective cloaking mechanism and that they are now COMPLETELY  invisible to us?

 

CGI Photoshop Debunkers / Hoaxers

 

After the sightings came to prevalence in 2007 a series of badly thrown together CGI YouTube movies and photographs then emerged – some produced by fame-seeking photoshop junkies desperate to showcase their ‘talents’, some by copycats and those desperate for viral video status – but none of the CGI hoxers came even remotely close to resembling the original images. Nor could they explain the ever growing number of witnesses, from all ages and walks of life and geographically separate locations in the United States.

 

Some websites and forums  claim that the drones are a hoax, but most of these sites are run by pseudosceptics who have an interest in keeping the status quo. None of them address the incredible amount of witness testimony that has been gathered from real people from diverse backgrounds.

 

With Mary’s new testimony, there are now witness reports spanning nearly 30 years.  This is no CGI hoax, or fad, or social media viral campaign.  This is a real phenomena and it deserves further investigation.

 

Hours of Compelling Testimony

 

The sheer weight of witness testimony by unrelated individuals of all ages, professions and located in different parts of the continental United States is simply overwhelming and hard to ignore. It is my belief that most people have not heard ALL (if even any) of the absolutely compelling witness testimony available on this subject.  For anyone who has doubts over the validity of the dragonfly drones you simply must listen to the following Earthfiles podcast episodes 17, 18, 19, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 47. Click here to download and listen.

 

It is my view that most people dismissed the phenomena without bothering to look at the weight of evidence and testimony in it’s entirety and instead allowed forum debunkers and pseudosceptics to decide the evidence for them. Don’t let anyone live in your head rent free – as the saying goes.

 

What information do YOU have on these Dragonfly Drones?

 

I am very interested to hear from you if you were an original witness or if you have you have had your own personal sighting which so far has not been reported. If you know someone who has had an experience with these drones I would also like to hear from you.  Did you work at the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory or know Isaac?  Do you have photos of unexplained objects similar to this? Have you been keeping information on this subject to yourself for a time and now want to share?  Have you seen these symbols before? Do you know the cave in which these maybe contained? I encourage you to contact me with any  information you may think is relevant.

 

 

You can reach me at truthfall@truthfall.com – or private message via our special Drone Facebook Page

All requests for confidentiality will be respected and treated in the strictest confidence.

 

Further Resources

Read Isaac’s original whsitleblower testimony on the C.A.R.E.T program.

http://droneteam.com/isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/index.html

Hours of podcasts of witness testimony

http://www.earthfiles333.com/

Wiki Drone Site & Forum

http://www.droneteam.com

CARET Dragonfly Drones – Lake Tahoe Sighting

http://truthfall.com/caret-dragonfly-drones-lake-tahoe-sighting/

Weird Dragonfly Aerial Drones – The Chad Photos

http://truthfall.com/weird-dragonfly-aerial-drones-the-chad-photos/

Baltic Anomaly: Evidence of Ancient Mining Operation?

Posted on May 30, 2013

The OceanX team recently came back from a long anticipated third voyage to the Baltic Anomaly site.  There were some very interesting and intriguing goings on which will be the subject of an upcoming post.  But for now, the following news on the analysis of rock samples deserves a post of it’s own given the potential implications.

baltic_anomaly_updated_by_vaghauk

 

 

 by Truthfall.com editor – Craig Brown

It is not an object which is man made in modern time. What ever it is it’s either from during the ice age or pre-ice age.” – Peter Lindberg, February 24, 2013

 

Test Results Reveal Metal Composition of Samples

 

Using a technique known as Infrared Spectroscopy, a sample taken from the anomaly by one of the divers was brought back and then subsequently sent for analysis to the Weizmann institute in Israel. The results are very unexpected indeed. The results  indicate that a piece which was from the circle anomaly is made of Limonite and Goethite. These materials are part of the  Iron oxides/hydroxide family – “that it is metal” and that “these materials would most likely to be found in a modern construction”.

 

“Weizman institute said that it’s strange to have it in a structure like this and it’s more likely to find it in a modern shipwrecks (with metallic parts).I asked him: “So we can say that this thing is probably not of natural existence?” He think that it’s probably “modern” and not archaeological, something that someone built?”

The rock sample analysed by the Weizmann Institute

The rock sample analysed by the Weizmann Institute

The spectroscopic graph below should be read as follows:

 

a= The black powder, originally a piece broken off by a diver, directly off the circle anomaly.

 

b= Another solid piece broken off by a diver, directly off the circle anomaly

 

c= Comparison to a “pure” Limonite

 

Weizmann Institute’s opinion is that it is strange to find these materials in a structure like this as these materials would most likely to be found in a modern construction, such as on a ship wreck in this case.

Analysis of sample taken from the Baltic Anomaly.

Editor’s Note: According to Wikipedia “Infrared spectroscopy (IR spectroscopy) is the spectroscopy that deals with the infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum, that is light with a longer wavelength and lower frequency than visible light. It covers a range of techniques, mostly based on absorption spectroscopy. As with all spectroscopic techniques, it can be used to identify and study chemicals. A common laboratory instrument that uses this technique is a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer.”

 

Goethite

 

Goethite is primarily an Iron Ore. “It may also be precipitated by groundwater or in other sedimentary conditions, or form as a primary mineral in hydrothermal deposits”

 

Limonite

 

“Limonite is one of the two principle iron ores, the other being hematite, and has been mined for the production of iron since at least 2500 BCE.” …..”Although originally defined as a single mineral, limonite is now recognized as a mixture of related hydrated iron oxide minerals, among them goethite, akaganeite, lepidocrocite, and jarosite.” – source: Wikipedia. It is often the major iron component in lateritic soils. It is often deposited in run-off streams from mining operations.

 

Iron caps or gossans of siliceous iron oxide typically form as the result of intensive oxidation of sulfide ore deposits.[10] These gossans were used by prospectors as guides to buried ore. In addition the oxidation of those sulfide deposits which contained gold, often resulted in the concentration of gold in the iron oxide and quartz of the gossans. Goldbearing limonite gossans were productively mined in the Shasta County, California mining district.[10] Similar deposits were mined near Rio Tinto in Spain and Mount Morgan in Australia. In the Dahlonega gold belt in Lumpkin County, Georgia gold was mined from limonite-rich lateritic or saprolite soil. The gold of the primary veins was concentrated into the limonites of the deeply weathered rocks. In another example the deeply weathered iron formations of Brazil served to concentrate gold with the limonite of the resulting soils.

 

Transception Remote Viewers

 

These minerals found in samples of the anomaly and lying close by are Iron Ores, one of which gold can be frequently be found within.  Other samples like these have been found to have the appearance of being ‘burnt’ or to have been superheated.  It is interesting to note that back in 2012 a team of military trained remote viewers spent hours analysing this target – their conclusion published many months before this data was released was as follows -

 

“TRANSCEPTION’s preliminary analysis of the seven sessions specifically tasked against the Baltic Sea USO target (plus another one based on directly related tasking), suggests that the site is a complex of structures–a mining/production/resupply facility–among other things, centered around a special type of “lock” (described by the viewers as being “like” a “dam”, “barrier”, “missile silo”, and even Han Solo’s “moon tube”), mechanically operated and comprising, at least in part, a cluster of densely packed, hydraulic levers that arc energetically back and forth, controlling the flow of a liquid (most likely water) used in the production of a much needed viscous, energetic, oil-like substance, dark in color and possibly toxic, with constituent and extremely valuable elements/materials mined locally.” – link

 

 

The Baltic Sea has been through many geological changes and periods. It was once cut off from the saltwater ocean and was called Ancylus Lake 8,000 – 9,500 years ago. Tracing back through history reveals it has likely been covered by ice or water for at least 130,000 years when it was known as the Eemian Sea.  So if the anomaly is constructed (which is what the evidence so far suggests), then any construction would pre-date the pyramids in Egypt by at least 120,000 years.

 

More information and scientific study is certainly needed to make an exact determination as to the nature of this site, it’s purpose and to answer the question of who built it, but the latest analysis of these samples is very intriguing to say the least and could pave the way for establishing a link with our long forgotten past and perhaps great civilizations that came and went.

Baltic Anomaly: 3D Multibeam Sonar Image Revealed

Posted on May 25, 2013

Today we can reveal for the first time a 3D Multibeam Sonar image of the Baltic Anomaly. This image was posted on the team’s Facebook page last night and gives us a unique insight into the underwater geography some 80 metres below the surface of the Baltic Sea.

 

“As we have said before the multibeam does not give you a exact image of the bottom on a smaller scale. However, it gives you a good 3D image of a larger landscape”. – Peter Lindberg

Youtube clip courtesy Jack Herbon (Ocean Explorer Facebook Group)

The anomaly as a 3D multibeam sonar image.

The anomaly as a 3D multibeam sonar image. South is towards the top of the image.

Editor's Note: The Green coloured areas are areas of higher elevation and in terms of scale, areas of less than 8 metres will not be accurately defined.

OceanX Co-Founder Peter Lindberg had this to say…

 

“Ok, here it is in all its glory! Remember that there are a lot of things you do not see. The wedged gap between the upper part and the foundation for example. Or the right side (from the direction the image is, looking south) is completly gone on this image. Maybe we passed over the anomaly so the vertical sides on the right side were shadowed by the anomaly it self.”

 

“The image is treated so obvious “false” echoes are taken away. But it is impossible to work with the image more than that. It gives us a sence of the main features of the anomaly. You can not look into details because there are no details in this image. Things that might stick up might do so because of the bad resolution, they might not be there at all.

Well, enjoy!”

 

Multibeam Sonar

 

Lindberg went on….

 

“Hello folks, I will educate you a bit regarding multibeam. The image I show is of a wreck in Norway, recorded under perfect conditions. As we have said before the multibeam does not give you a exact image of the bottom on a smaller scale. However, it gives you a good 3D image of a larger landscape. When it comes to the multibeam data we got last year it is full of faults.”

 

“The motion sensor did not work propertly, it compensates for waves and such motions. The water velocity data was completly corrupt which means we did not get better resolution than approx 8 meters, it should be like 0,2 meters or so. This means that our image of the anomaly does not show the right features. You understand these things? If you do I will show you a corrupt multibeam image of the anomaly later to night.”

Wreck in Norway recorded under perfect conditions.

Example of multibeam sonar – Shipwreck in Norway recorded under perfect conditions.

Baltic Anomaly Mystery: New Voyage to 2nd Anomaly

Posted on May 18, 2013

The OceanExplorer team who made worldwide headlines in 2010 when they discovered a mysterious 747 sized anomaly on the floor Baltic Sea are making a surprise return to the anomaly site tomorrow. This time the focus is on exploring the second anomaly which lies a few hundred metres from the main site and which may hold the key to explaining exactly what this thing is.

“I’m filming everything we do, and when I get home in a couple of days then you will know because I’m gonna put out the films directly on the internet.” – Dennis Aasberg

Documentary

 

For the past year a Swedish film crew has been following the team. Titan TV have just recently completed editing the hour long documentary and it is now in the process of being sold to interested TV channels.  The above trailer gives an intriguing glimpse of what we can expect to see – although from talking to the team it seems there is a lot yet which is very mysterious that has not yet been revealed. There are so many strange features on the object that it is really difficult to explain – perfectly round holes set within a perfect square, long ‘corridors’ that have smooth walls and straight edges. And then recently a discovery of an object that looks like an alien skull lying on the bottom. Then there’s the rocks which have been superheated, yet scientists say this region has been utterly devoid of any volcanic activity.

 

“Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” – Carl Sagan

Veteran Swedish treasure hunters, the Ocean Explorer Team will at last embark on a long anticipated third trip to the massive and mysterious object lying some 85 metres under the Baltic Sea – known simply as the “Baltic Anomaly”.

 

Special report by Craig Brown (Editor)

 

Preparations

 

Speaking directly now from the island of Öland which lies 6km off the Swedish mainland, Ocean Explorer team leader Dennis Aasberg and his team of divers and crew have been investigating some other wrecks this last week -  some of which they found last year.

 

Second Anomaly

 

Both previous trips have focused on the main anomaly.  The last time the team went out, bad weather ruined any plans they had for exploring the second anomaly.  This time though things should be different.  The second anomaly lies close to the main structure a few hundred metres away and resembles a gothic church window when viewing it on sonar.  This second anomaly may hold the key to revealing the nature of this site and could finally put an end to the mystery of what this site is.

Approximate location of the anomaly based on the anecdotal evidence so far.

Approximate location of the anomaly based on the anecdotal evidence so far.

According to a recently released video by Dennis, they have all been eating well and stocking up with supplies in readiness to set sail back to the circle tomorrow morning. This time all video footage can be released as they will not be under contract to Titan TV – the makers of the documentary.

Latest rendering of the anomaly by Hauke Vagt

Latest rendering of the anomaly by Hauke Vagt

(Above) – Video released some hours ago where Dennis announces they are going back to the anomaly.

 

OceanX team leader Dennis Aasberg explains – “And then after that, depends on many things now, but, we are gonna go to the circle, the object again, and go to the second object,  we have never been there before, so this is a very interesting step for us, I’ve waited for this for a very long time to see what the second object is, so tomorrow, I hope everything go right, we are gonna go also there and look at this object for the first time.”

 

“The big object we have been there a couple of times as you know. So now we gonna go down there with and if everything is OK, we gonna go down with the divers. Depends on many things, we cannot do much more than look at it.  To take the samples now, we don’t have the things now these days, but this summer there are many things I cannot tell you know that are going on around us, that we are gonna work on this summer, but now with this object two, were gonna go down and take a look at it for the first time.”

 

“So tomorrow we will lose the connection because we will be out on the Baltic Sea, but I’m filming everything we do, everything we do, I’m filming, and when I get home in a couple of days then you will know because I’m gonna put out the films directly on the internet on our homepage. Now I’m going to go to sleep because I’m very tired and it has been a very long day today. Take care everybody out there and thank you for your support. We look forward to get some kind of understanding of what we have found out there in the Baltic Sea.  This object number  two is perhaps is the answer for everything, we don’t know, we will see.”

Top arrow points to as yet uninvestigated second anomaly - the focus of this trip.

Top arrow points to as yet uninvestigated second anomaly – the focus of this trip.

Straight walls and right angles many tens of metres long.

Straight walls and right angles many tens of metres long have been found on the largest structure.

OceanX Joint Founder - Dennis Aasberg

OceanX Joint Founder – Dennis Aasberg

Square depression with round hole looks almost certainly "manufactured" or crafted somehow.  Click for larger image.

Square depression with round hole looks almost certainly “manufactured” or crafted somehow. Click for larger image.

sonar-straight-lines-3
This newly released multi-beam sonar image shows yet more straight edges which seemingly contradict mainstream explanations.

This newly released multi-beam sonar image shows yet more straight edges which seemingly contradict mainstream explanations.

Cleaned up and enhanced image of the Baltic anomaly

Cleaned up and enhanced image of the Baltic anomaly

skull-OceanX-2

Zoomed in and enhanced – An object resembling a skull lies close by.

skull-1

The robotic claw of the rover with ‘skull’ object on the ocean floor.

Photograph of screen from ROV camera showing more straight edges and 90 degree angles. Click for larger image.

Photograph of screen from ROV camera showing more straight edges and 90 degree angles. Click for larger image.

"The Meringue" -  Approximately 4 metres wide is only one of many strange features sitting on TOP of the dome of the formation.

“The Meringue” – Approximately 4 metres wide is only one of many strange features sitting on TOP of the dome of the formation.

 

Rock Samples

 

“We are waiting for a “go ahead” from a scientist regarding quite intriguing lab analyses.”

 

“Right now it is on the scientists and the labs credibility if we announce something in advance before it is confirmed and confirmed again. These things takes time and the reason it has not been done before is because of lot of scepticism from other scientist and experts. No one has wanted to do any lab test unless we paid a lot of money. Imagine those scientist who have to make a living out of saying that “it is like this and it always has been like this”, their careers and credibility are on stake. Therefore they maybe do not really like it if someone turns up with something completely revolutionary, opposite what they have written books and scientific thesis about. Maybe that’s why there were no samba orchestra waiting for us when we returned from the expeditions…” — Peter Lindberg, April 6, 2013

 

For further research please read our previous articles on the Baltic Anomaly:

Baltic Anomaly Update: OceanX Seek Panama Treasures
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-update-oceanx-seek-panama-treasures/

Baltic USO Anomaly: Expedition To Find The Truth
http://truthfall.com/baltic-uso-anomaly-expedition-to-find-the-truth/

Baltic Anomaly News Update : Bad Weather Hampers Expedition Start
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-news-update-bad-weather-hampers-expedition-start/

Baltic Anomaly: Ship Now Anchored Directly Above Object
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-ship-now-anchored-directly-above-object/

Baltic Anomaly Divers: “Really Amazed” By What They’ve Seen
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-divers-really-amazed-by-what-theyve-seen/

Baltic Anomaly USO: “This Is No Game” Says OceanX Team
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-uso-this-is-no-game-says-oceanx-team/

Baltic Anomaly: First Pictures
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-first-pictures/

Baltic Anomaly: Far Stranger Than Any UFO Discovery
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-far-stranger-than-any-ufo-discovery/

Baltic Anomaly: Establishment Press Spin Scam Story
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-establishment-press-spin-scam-story/

Baltic Anomaly: New Expedition After Astonishing Images
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-new-expedition-after-astonishing-images/

A full report on the team’s expedition and findings will follow – hopefully with some new images.

 

Get Involved

OceanX Team Official Sitehttp://oceanexplorer.se

Join The OceanX Team Facebook Grouphttp://www.facebook.com/groups/178384865554985/

Buy Official OceanX Clothing herehttp://shop.textalk.se/en/artgrp.php?id=15417&grp=461166

Dennis Aasberg Bloghttp://oceanxteam.blogspot.se/

Baltic Anomaly Fan Sitehttp://thebalticanomaly.se/

 

The issue of the Baltic Anomaly is being ignored, twisted or subverted by the mainstream press and academia.  Please help to raise awareness of this subject by sharing this post on your social networks.

CARET Dragonfly Drones – Lake Tahoe Sighting

Posted on May 9, 2013

Starting in May 2006 and peaking in 2007 more than a dozen different witnesses in different parts of the United States and further afield reported seeing weird dragonfly drone-like aerial objects in broad daylight.

 

Starting last week and over the coming weeks, I will be taking a fascinating new look at the events that took place around that time.  For many this will be the first time they have heard these reports as it was not reported to any significant extent in the mainstream media.

One of the original Chad photos neat Highway 17 Los Gatos.

One of the original Chad photos near Highway 17 Los Gatos CA.

 

Lake Tahoe – The second of my special reports  – by Craig Brown

 

Bizarre Features

 

Described as having a “ring body” with a tail and “appendages”,  the craft were slow moving, usually silent, or if anything they emitted a static, crackling, or sound of high voltage usually accompanied by the feeling of a static charge in the air.  The craft have mostly been observed and photographed above trees or power poles for some reason.

 

Popular investigative news site Earthfiles.com, written by Linda Moulton-Howe covered the ever evolving story as one after one, new witnesses, testimony and photos emerged throughout 2006 and 2007. Linda had taken to calling them drones since the bodies of the craft were only described as a maximum of two feet thick and therefore not capable of being piloted by humans, but rather they appeared to be being remotely piloted or controlled by some other means.

 

  • Ring Body With A Tall Circular Crown of Wires On Top Pointing Upward
  • White / Grey / Metallic Body
  • Flat “Wing” or Projection Broken Into Sections Leading Out From Ring Body
  • Weird Hieroglyphic Symbols On Bottom Of Craft
  • Slow Moving / Can Hover Silently / Move Like A Dragonfly
  • Photographed at Tree Top Level Usually / Near Power Poles
  • Will react to torchlight shined on them
  • Witnesses get they impression they are observing us / collecting information / doing surveillance

 

After the initial publicity surrounding the Chad photos (see previous report) another report of these craft emerged. It was  submitted to MUFON on 5th MAY 2007.  The report submitted is printed below along with the two cellphone photos of the object and a screen-capture of the original MUFON database entry.  According to MUFON this witness was identified as Deborah McKinley of San Jose, but this has never been verified.

 

Lake Tahoe sighting
MUFON submitter 1073
Lake Tahoe-05-05-07

 

“My husband and I were in Lake Tahoe over the weekend. We left on Friday afternoon and came back Monday morning. On Saturday at about 7 PM, I was walking out to my car to get a sweater when I saw this thing in the sky. It was pretty close I think, but still above the trees. It was moving and spinning slowly, heading towards my right.

 

I was startled and confused at first and wanted to take a picture, but our camera was still inside so I took two pictures with my camera phone before it passed behind the roof of the house. I ran around to the other side and was yelling to my husband to come out. We came around the other side and saw it just as it was going down behind some trees. He didn’t get a good look at it, but he saw enough to convince him that it was something really strange.”

7013_submitter_file1_070505_02

First of two cellphone photos showing the drone hovering over some trees and powerlines.

First of two cellphone photos showing the drone hovering over some trees and powerlines.

Second of two cellphone photos showing the drone disappearing behind this house.

“We decided to take a drive around the area to see if we could see it again, but we never did. We didn’t see it the next day either. Since we were renting the cabin for the weekend we didn’t know any nearby residents but I would bet at least a few other people saw it. It was very visible and very strange looking. I was definitely a little freaked out but my husband didn’t seem very bothered by it. He was more interested in it than scared.”

 

“He wanted to drive around a lot longer trying to find it than I did! It didn’t make any noise except for a very, very faint sound that is hard to describe but sounded like something vibrating. We both heard the sound although just barely. It moved in a very straight line when it went over the house but when we saw it on the other side of the house, when it was going down behind the trees, it made a very sharp turn. It didn’t move like a helicopter or airplane, it was very “exact”.

 

“We did see one person on our drive who was a few blocks away taking a walk and asked him if he saw it, and he said no. Then we asked him if he heard any weird noise and tried to describe it as best we could, and he said he might have but he wasn’t sure. By this time it was at least 20 minutes since we first saw the thing so who knows.”

 

“I talked to some friends over the week about sending these to a newspaper or something but a guy at work suggested I look up Mufon, so I’m starting with you guys.”

ENDS.

 

The original MUFON report from Lake Tahoe.

The original MUFON report from Lake Tahoe. Click and then click again for full size enlargement.

 

To the best of my knowledge there has never been any specifically identified location for the Lake Tahoe photographs despite the efforts of many people using Google StreetView.  According to some information sources the photos are most likely to have been taken on the west side of Lake Tahoe possibly in Eldorado or Placer County, but that’s the extent of the investigation.

lake-tahoe-eldorado-county

Lake Tahoe

Trees

 

As I mentioned previously these craft seem to be always sighted near or above trees and forests or powerpoles. It is curious that in this instance also the photos show the craft just above treetop height and again it seems to be skimming / rotating as it moves along above the powerlines. The whole area to the west of Lake Tahoe is wilderness, including several state parks and remote forests.

 

Previous Article In Order

 

Chad Photos

1. http://truthfall.com/weird-dragonfly-aerial-drones-the-chad-photos/

 

 

Still to Come

 

In the next article in this series examining the strange drone craft I will be reviewing the Rajman sighting which occurred in the city of  Campbell CA on the May 20th 2007.

 

 

Plea for new information and witnesses

 

What information do YOU have about these things?

 

I am very interested to hear from you if you were an original witness or if you have you have had your own personal sighting of one of these drones which so far has not been reported. If you know someone who has had an experience with these things I would also like to hear from you.  Did you work at the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory?  Do you have photos of unexplained objects similar to this? Have you been keeping information on this subject to yourself for a time and now want to share?  I would encourage you to contact me with your information.

 

You can reach me at contact@overunity.co – or private message me through our special Drone Facebook Page All requests for confidentiality will be respected and treated in the strictest confidence.

Weird Dragonfly Aerial Drones – The Chad Photos

Posted on April 30, 2013

For years I have been fascinated by the events of 2006 / 2007 when more than a dozen different witnesses in different parts of the United States and further afield reported seeing weird dragonfly drone-like aerial objects in broad daylight.

 

The first of a series of special reports by Craig Brown – The Chad Photos

 

Described as having a “ring body” with a tail and “appendages”,  the craft were slow moving, usually silent, or if anything they emitted a static, crackling, or sound of high voltage usually accompanied by the feeling of a static charge in the air.  Popular investigative news site Earthfiles.com, written by Linda Moulton-Howe covered the ever evolving story as one after one, new witnesses, testimony and photos emerged throughout 2006 and 2007. Linda had taken to calling them drones since the bodies of the craft were only described as a maximum of two feet thick and therefore not capable of being piloted by humans, but rather they appeared to be being remotely piloted or controlled by some other means.

ChadDrone2007_a

The first photo taken of the craft with a cellphone camera (2007 standard).

Debunkers

 

Perhaps due to the impressive full colour daylight photographs of these craft, elements of the UFO community debunked the story, contrary to the massive breadth and depth of evidence.  A series of badly thrown together CGI movies then followed – produced by fame-seekers, copycats and those seeking viral video status – none of which came close to resembling the original images.  It is my view that most people dismissed the phenomena without looking at the weight of evidence and testimony in it’s entirety.

 

There is much to this story and it cannot be easily explained in one single article – so I will be presenting the subject over a series of articles looking at each sighting and the supporting information again.

 

I have waited for several years now for new information and reports to emerge, but the subject has turned into a bit of a UFO cold case. Therefore, I am writing this series of articles with several objectives in mind.

 

New Effort

 

In an effort to hopefully reinvigorate and re-awaken the investigation, to focus attention back on this real phenomena, to bring forward possible new witnesses, to make contact with old witnesses and perhaps even encourage Isaac to release more of his cache of C.A.R.E.T. (Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology) documents into the public domain.

 

Chad

 

On May 11th 2007, a series of 6 photos were sent to webmaster Lex at popular radio program “Coast To Coast AM“.  The photos dated May 6th 2007, were taken by a Central California resident calling himself  “Chad” and were accompanied by a brief explanation as to how he had came about these images.  Although this was technically not the first sighting, (as we will discover in a later article), the “Chad photos” are generally accepted to be the most prolific sighting and catalyst for bringing this bizarre phenomena to the public gaze.

ChadDrone2007_a1

Below (in his own words) is the exact email that Chad sent to Coast To Coast AM back in April/May 2007 and the same 6 photographs he sent to them.

 

“Last month (April 2007), my wife and I were on a walk when we noticed a very large, very strange “craft” in the sky. My wife took a picture with her cell phone camera (second photo). A few days later a friend (and neighbor) lent me his camera and came with me to take photos of this “craft”. We found it and took a number of very clear photos. Picture #1 is taken from right below this thing and I must give my friend credit as I was not brave enough to get close enough to take this picture myself!”

ChadDrone2007_b

“The craft is almost completely silent and moves very smoothly. It usually moves slowly until it decides to take off. Then it moves VERY quickly and is out of sight in the blink of an eye. MORE THAN ANYTHING I simply want to understand what this is and why it is here?”

ChadDrone2007_c

“We found your show with Google and I have listened for a few nights now. I have decided that if anyone can help me understand what this thing is, it is you and your audience. I must admit I am deeply unsettled by this thing. I have never seen anything like this in my life… Location: I would prefer not to say for now. “

 

–Chad

 

Chad then wrote back to Coast To Coast with additional info:

 

“Thank you so much for posting my photos! I hope someone can help identify this… First of all, I see this thing VERY often. Since it first appeared, I have probably seen this thing maybe 8 different times since the first appearance. My friend and I went out the next day after I first saw it to get the photos, but it was not there. Then we tried again the next day, and we found it within like 30 minutes and followed it for a while. Most of the time I see it out of windows in my house, in the distance. but I would say almost half of the hikes I have gone on in my area, I have seen it very close. It is very easy to photograph and…many neighbors aside from my friend have also seen it. “

ChadDrone2007_d

 

 

ChadDrone2007_e

Underneath the craft strange hieroglyphics are evident – they do not match any known language.

“It is almost totally silent but not quite. It makes kind of “crackling” noises. It’s hard to describe them but they are only intermittent and not very loud, but you can notice them. Sometimes there is a very slight hum that sounds kind of mechanical, almost like when you are near very large power lines. But it is nothing loud like a jet engine, it is very quiet for the most part.”

 

“It moves almost like an insect. If you have ever seen a bug on a pond, it is kind of like that. It is VERY smooth and slow most of the time, but then every now and then it will rotate very quickly and go VERY fast into another direction, then stop, and repeat the process all over again. There is just something very unnatural about the way it moves. “

 

“Also, I have had maybe 4 headaches in the last week, and I am normally not the kind of person who really ever gets them. Also my wife has been tired and fatigued lately. She is about a month pregnant, and the doctor said fatigue is normal around this time, but I worry that it is a lot. Basically what I’m worried is that this “craft” has got some kind of radiation or something. Like I said, it sounds like power lines if you get close enough to it. Obviously I am worried for our health, especially with a baby on the way. I dont know if they are related, but again, this is why I really hope someone can answer these questions!”

 

Location Identified

 

The Chad drone photos were originally stated to have been taken in Bakersfield, but keen-eyed members of the public later identified the actual site as just off Highway 17, near the restaurant known as the  “Summit Snack Shack” or “Summit Roadhouse” as it was later renamed, which at this point runs parallel to the old Santa Cruz Highway approx 4-7 miles south of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County, California.

Los Gatos is the nearest town approx 4-7 miles North.

Los Gatos is the nearest town approx 4-7 miles North.

At the time (in 2007) part of the land from which at least two of the photographs appear to have been taken reside on private property. One or more of the photos appear to have been taken from the dirt track / road at the rear of the restaurant deck area.

 

Private Property

 

Despite bordering on what some have said is “private land”, it is easy to see how someone could easily access these areas and not even realise they were on private property.  It was perhaps always assumed that Chad and his girlfriend had been “hikers”.  However, in the original email Chad simply says he and his girlfriend were out on a “walk” and he said that he had seen it maybe eight times before from his house.  So perhaps then, Chad and his girlfriend did not walk here and enter through the front of the property as initially assumed – perhaps they actually reside in one of the private houses down the hill and that they WALKED UP the hill towards the back of the restaurant.

 

Local Knowledge

 

Chad admits he is a local who has  seen this craft on many occasion from his house along with several of his neighbours.  So since he is a local, he would have had a reasonable knowledge of the area, the roads, the houses and there would be a good chance that he knows the owner of the property, so there would be no cause for concern by the owner of anyone trespassing. It is entirely possible that the reason Chad was so spooked by these things is that he actually LIVES closer to the location of the photos than we think – perhaps the drone has even flown directly over his house.

Santa Cruz Highway - Aerial view of the site of the Chad photos

Santa Cruz Highway – Aerial view of the site of the Chad photos

 

Streetview and aerial shot of location.

Google Streetview and aerial shot of location as it looked circa 2012 – the craft would potentially have been visible to cars driving along the Highway.

Aerial image of the CHAD location.

Aerial image of the CHAD location.

Droneteam.com

 

There seem to be many people out there still fascinated by these strange events back in 2007/2008, especially as they relate to something so bizarre and (if proven true), certainly some of the clearest daytime photographs of unusual aerial phenomena ever recorded. Some individuals who were equally keen to get to the bottom of the mystery setup a website a few years ago to research all aspects of the phenomena. Droneteam.com, which is still active today (albeit very quiet), was setup by a group of like-minded individuals to get to the bottom of the drone sightings.  Their efforts paid off as they made some reasonable progress in uncovering locations from photographs and gathering the facts of many of these sightings.

Anyone interested in this subject is encouraged to go there and research further as it is a great information resource on this subject.

 

Private Eyes

 

The people behind droneteam.com ended up hiring local private investigators Tom Davis and Frank Dixon of TK Davis Investigations to investigate the drone sightings.  The pair (both in their 60′s at the time) were tasked with finding new leads, identifying locations and pursuing avenues of enquiry in an effort to uncover the truth.

 

An article in the LA Times and an interview for Fox News featuring the PIs helped publicize the story to a wider audience, but as would be expected, the mainstream media was more interested in presenting the story in a less than serious manor despite the serious implications of covert monitoring by unknown drone craft.

 

Today, the original TK Davis website is no longer active, so I am guessing they have probably retired from the PI business. You can still checkout the website as it was back then in 2007 if you use the internet archive Wayback Machine.

 

Today

 

After Chad’s initial contact with Coast to Coast AM, Linda Moulton-Howe of Earthfiles.com corresponded with Chad over a series of several emails.  In a podcast she admitted to having Chad’s real name, address and details – so this lends more credibilty to his testimony.  After the exchanging of some emails for a while Chad then stopped responding and ultimately the trail of this particular sighting has gone cold.

 

To my knowledge Chad has never been identified and nor has his house in the valley near Highway 17 from which he saw these objects on eight separate occasions.

 

Still to Come

 

In the next article in this series examining the strange drone craft I will be reviewing the Lake Tahoe sighting which occurred on the 5th May 2007.

 

Plea for new information and witnesses

 

What information do YOU have about these things?

 

I am very interested to hear from you if you have you have had your own personal sighting of one of these drones. If you know someone who has had an experience with them. Did you work at the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory?  Do you have photos of unexplained objects similar to this? Have you been keeping information on this subject to yourself for a time and now want to share?  I would encourage you to contact me with your information.

 

You can reach me at contact@overunity.co – or private message me through our special Drone Facebook Page All requests for confidentiality will be respected and treated in the strictest confidence.

 

 

Investigation – CARET / Dragonfly Drones / Isaac Material

Posted on April 24, 2013

What the hell is this? – That tends to be the reaction of most people upon seeing these things for the first time.  All will be explained in due course – over a period of several posts on this topic.

One of the Dragonfly Drones skimming above a telegraph pole.

One of the Dragonfly Drones skimming above a telegraph pole.

This is the first post of a series where I plan to revisit the CARET (Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology) / Dragonfly Drone / Isaac material in depth.

 

Earthfiles Investigation

 

The initial investigation into the spate of drone sightings was performed very professionally by Earthfiles.com’s Linda Moulton-Howe over a period of several years.  However, since then the articles have fallen behind a pay-wall and are no longer accessible without a subscription leaving many people in the dark on this phenomena. I sent a Facebook message to Linda Moulton-Howe asking if she had any new information on this and as yet I have not recieved a reply.

Craft050607b ChadDroneRajman14 ChadRajman17May16

Many different witnesses came forward at the time, from all different professions and walks of life and sightings spanning as far back as 1985  – the testimony of these individuals is very hard to ignore and the subject matter has been largely ignored thanks to a deliberate debunking campaign centered around the misinformation that these craft were simply products of CGI manipulation.  The sincerity, depth and breadth of the witness testimony obliterates the theory that this was CGI and / or viral marketing.  Some CGI videos appeared, but they were obvious fakes and have nothing in relation tot he truth of this subject.

 

Even some die-hard believers fell for the debunker propaganda and still to this day MOST people are not familiar with the many hours of recorded interviews conducted by Linda Moulton-Howe on this subject, and so simply cite “something they heard in a forum” or “I heard that…”.  I urge those people to THINK for THEMSELVES.

 

The aim of re-opening the story to the general public is for several reasons -

 

  • Finding out exactly what these things are and what they are doing in our skies.
  • To uncover new witnesses to this phenomena and bring forward newer up to date sightings / photographs.
  • Given that we are moving towards full disclosure – hopefully prompt Isaac to release more of the C.A.R.E.T material that he has in his possession and speed the disclosure along.

 

Have you had a sighting or have photographs of one of these things?  Did you also work at the CARET facility in Palo Alto?  Have you any knowledge on what these things are? – If so, you can contact me at contact@overunity.co – All requests for anonymity are honored and will be in complete confidence.

 

I have setup a Facebook page dedicated to spreading awareness of these things and finding answers to the many questions surrounding this phenomena. If you are interested in joining the investigation then get involved.

 

Join here – https://www.facebook.com/DragonflyDronesCARET

 

Massive Black Trinagle UFO In NASA’s Own Image

Posted on March 6, 2013

A Massive black triangular UFO appears in two of a series of NASA’s own photographs.

 

This image, taken from on board the space shuttle Columbia mission STS-61-C in 1986 was only recently discovered in the archives and appears on “The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth” website. Looks like the airbrushing dept at NASA missed a memo for this one.

 

 Conveniently Unfortunately, the only image resolution available for this image is a rather paltry 640 x 480, however it clearly shows a very large triangular object some distance from the shuttle – clicking on the “Request Original File” link results in a webpage stating “Invalid file specified”.   And how do NASA account for this object – “space debris”.  Seriously, who writes this stuff!

STS61C-31-2

That’s no moon.

"Space Debris" with equal proportions and straight edges.

“Space Debris” with equal proportions and straight edges.

STS61C-31-3

Craft now turned pointing towards Earth.

Nasa-UFO-Black-Triangle-Clouseup-STS61C-31-3

Debris? Seriously – have you been drinking?

A screen capture of NASA's website showing the massive black triangle in plain site.

A screen capture of NASA’s website showing the massive black triangle in plain site.

NASA Mission STS-61-C mission patch.

NASA Mission STS-61-C mission patch.

Technical details of the image posted below.

 

Identification

Mission: STS61C Roll: 31 Frame: 2 Mission ID on the Film or image: 61-C
Country or Geographic Name: ATLANTIC OCEAN
Features: SPACE DEBRIS
Center Point Latitude: Center Point Longitude: (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Stereo: No (Yes indicates there is an adjacent picture of the same area)
ONC Map ID: JNC Map ID:


Camera

Camera Tilt: High Oblique
Camera Focal Length: 100mm
Camera: HB: Hasselblad
Film: 5017 : Kodak, natural color positive, Ektachrome, X Professional, ASA 64, standard base.


Quality

Film Exposure: Normal
Percentage of Cloud Cover: 70 (51-75)


Nadir

Date: 19860112 (YYYYMMDD)GMT Time: 135925 (HHMMSS)
Nadir Point Latitude: -11.5, Longitude: 2.2 (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Nadir to Photo Center Direction:
Sun Azimuth: 246 (Clockwise angle in degrees from north to the sun measured at the nadir point)
Spacecraft Altitude: 175 nautical miles (324 km)
Sun Elevation Angle: 59 (Angle in degrees between the horizon and the sun, measured at the nadir point)
Orbit Number: 2

View the original image here.

http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/QuickView.pl?directory=ISD&ID=STS61C-31-2

 

Baltic Anomaly – Alien ‘Skull’ Object Adds To Mystery

Posted on February 18, 2013

A startling new video clip showing what appears to be an elongated skull lying on the ocean floor has been released by the Ocean Explorer team in the past few days – (scroll down for video).

skull-1

Another variation in angle as the ROV films the artifact on the seabed.

The two minutes and 42 second clip was taken last year by one of the ROVs (Remotely Operated Vehicles) used by the team. The Ocean Modules V8 Sii ROV was being piloted remotely from the ship in an effort to explore the site when the team came across the bizarre discovery.

‘For so long have i not been able to tell anyone about this. So this feels good, i remember my heart pounding a bit faster the moment this showed up on the screen.’ – Jimmi Aasberg (OceanX Team)

The object was found lying beside the main 60 metre wide anomaly at a depth of 79 metres – it is thought to be only one of many curious finds that the team have made at the site – most of which are still under a contractual embargo by the TV company who financed the trip and will be revealed later this year when the 60 minute documentary is broadcast.

 

It is believed that no attempt was made to recover the object at the time as the ROV’s propulsion system kicks up a lot of silt from the bottom and this was severely hindering the divers visibility around the object. A new expedition in 2013 may try and salvage the object along with other objects and samples at the site.

The Ocean Modules V8 Sii ROV being deployed last year to look at the anomaly.

The Ocean Modules V8 Sii ROV being deployed last year to look at the anomaly.

‘It is not a hole, look from the beginning, you will see the back side of… What ever it is, but anyway, you’ll see that it is an object laying on the “anomaly” and the size is as a football. We have been allowed by Titan to show this sequence which we think look at bit odd and together with everything else makes you kind of think. We are bound by a contract and we can not release what ever we want, but you just wait for the documentary and you’ll see some more interesting stuff. ‘- Peter Lindberg (OceanX Co-Founder)

skull-OceanX

Close up and colour enhancement.

skull-OceanX-2

Close up and colour enhancement.

skull-OceanX-3

Close up and colour enhancement.

Image rotated through 90 degrees.

Image rotated through 90 degrees.

skull-2

ROV claw and object lying on seabed.

“Have no answer to what it is … but now you understand why we work with this … This is just one of many strange things there.” – Dennis Aasberg (OceanX Co-Founder)

 

The sidescan sonar shows the main anomlay (left) and the second anomaly which has yet to be explored.

The sidescan sonar shows the main anomlay (left) and the second anomaly which has yet to be explored.

Circular formations of rocks.

Circular formations of rocks seems deliberate and unnatural.

What is the strange hole and where does it lead?

What is the strange hole and where does it lead?

"The Meringue" -  Approximately 4 metres wide is only one of many strange features sitting on TOP of the dome of the formation.

“The Meringue” – Approximately 4 metres wide is only one of many strange features sitting on TOP of the dome of the formation.

Editor’s Comment:  This newly released footage of what appears to be an elongated skull, similar to what you would call your classic ‘gray’ alien may turn out to be nothing more than the head of a statue or a curiously shaped rock, but examining this on it’s own does not put this latest find in the context it deserves. Consider for a moment the photographs and the entire list of anomalies and interactions the team have made public so far. What is the likelihood of so many unnatural formations and irregularities together in one place?

 

  • Object is 200ft accross mushroom shaped comprising a thick pillar rising 8 metres out of the seabed with a 4 metre thick dome on top (like a mushroom shape) – rising a total of 12 metres (approx 40 feet) high above the surrounding seabed which lies at the end of a 1500 metre ‘skid’ or gouge on an otherwise featureless seabed.
  • A second and third anomaly lying nearby – anomaly two has the appearance of a gothic church window with what appear to be two similarly sized arches.
  • Anomaly three – an underwater mountain 1500m to the South.
  • Large straight lines, walls and corridors in excess of 10 metres long with flat, smooth surfaces.
  • Dome shaped object nicknamed “The Meringue” approximately 4 metres wide and sits on top of the object.
  • Right angles and unnatural depressions many metres long.
  • A perfectly round hole in the object (as yet unexplored).
  • A 1-2 metre wide square depression with a perfectly circular depression inside.
  • Stone circles, like “fireplaces”, of hard black “almost petrified” burnt looking stone each a few inches in diameter, like 4 or 5 pearls in a necklace in various arrangements on top of the dome.
  • Threats and intimidation by outside parties.

If the military remote viewers are correct then this anomaly is one of many similar sites on the seabed and therefore there is a good chance that the navy / military / intelligence services already know about this. Are you a whistle-blower, ex-military, contractor who has knowledge of what this anomaly is? Have you encountered this kind of formation before in the course of your work? Contact editor@overunity.co   Requests for confidentiality are always treated in the strictest of confidence.

 

For further research please read our previous articles on the Baltic Anomaly:

Baltic Anomaly – Alien ‘Skull’ Object Adds to Mystery

http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-alien-skull-object-adds-to-mystery/

Baltic Anomaly Update: OceanX Seek Panama Treasures
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-update-oceanx-seek-panama-treasures/

Baltic USO Anomaly: Expedition To Find The Truth
http://truthfall.com/baltic-uso-anomaly-expedition-to-find-the-truth/

Baltic Anomaly News Update : Bad Weather Hampers Expedition Start
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-news-update-bad-weather-hampers-expedition-start/

Baltic Anomaly: Ship Now Anchored Directly Above Object
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-ship-now-anchored-directly-above-object/

Baltic Anomaly Divers: “Really Amazed” By What They’ve Seen
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-divers-really-amazed-by-what-theyve-seen/

Baltic Anomaly USO: “This Is No Game” Says OceanX Team
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-uso-this-is-no-game-says-oceanx-team/

Baltic Anomaly: First Pictures
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-first-pictures/

Baltic Anomaly: Far Stranger Than Any UFO Discovery
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-far-stranger-than-any-ufo-discovery/

Baltic Anomaly: Establishment Press Spin Scam Story
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-establishment-press-spin-scam-story/

Baltic Anomaly: New Expedition After Astonishing Images
http://truthfall.com/baltic-anomaly-new-expedition-after-astonishing-images/

A full report on the team’s expedition and findings will follow – hopefully with some new images.

 

Get Involved

OceanX Team Official Sitehttp://oceanexplorer.se

Join The OceanX Team Facebook Grouphttp://www.facebook.com/groups/178384865554985/

Buy Official OceanX Clothing herehttp://shop.textalk.se/en/artgrp.php?id=15417&grp=461166

Dennis Aasberg Bloghttp://oceanxteam.blogspot.se/

Baltic Anomaly Fan Sitehttp://thebalticanomaly.se/

 

The issue of the Baltic Anomaly is being ignored, twisted or subverted by the mainstream press and academia.  Please help to raise awareness of this subject by sharing this post on your social networks.