British Prime Minister David Cameron is now openly pushing for a single European Govt. Fear-mongering about the possible failure of the Euro is being used as a pretext for taking another step towards the new world order plan for global domination and control.
From the Daily Mail
David Cameron has given his strongest warning yet that the euro is doomed to fail as fears grow that Greece is close to crashing out of the single currency. The Prime Minister dismissed new French president Francois Hollande’s claim that Britain was ‘indifferent’ to the fate of the eurozone, insisting it was essential for our economy that the Continent recovers.
‘We want the euro area to succeed,’ Mr Cameron said in an interview with the Daily Mail. ‘It’s 40 per cent of our exports. It’s vitally important these economies get back to growth.
‘The difficulty for us is we take a different view about the euro. We didn’t join. We think that single currencies really require single governments if they are going to work properly. ‘We have to recognise that the euro is a project in enormous transition. It could go in any number of different ways. Making sense of the euro for me would mean that those eurozone countries would have to have much more co-ordinated economic policy, much more co-ordinated debt policy. ‘There’s nowhere in the world that has a single currency without having more of a single government.’
Read more related posts:
Disclosure movie Sirius is moving forwar...
Nasa's Curiosity rover has discovered a ...
A BBC documentary film crew has been hel...
Possibly the most significant disclosure...
That’s a bit of a stretch to take his comments out of context in such a way for a headline. Reminds me of how the regular media works…
Ha ha, that headline is SO out of kilter with the reality of the article. Britain is very ANTI a single europe, thats why we didn’t join in the single currency experiment. To read that comment as meaning the current UK leadership wants a single European government shows a huge lack of understanding of British and European politics and the subtlety of of the English (British) language. Camerons comments really means “The UK would be better off if the Euro didn’t fail. Without a single government running the Euro it will fail, There is no chance the diverse countries of Europe will ever accept a single government, so, iso facto, it will fail”
Phil, which part of “We think that single currencies really require single governments” do you find confusing? Those were his exact words. Seems pretty clear to me.
Nowhere in the article does Cameron say that he wants a single currency. He wants the Euro AREA to succeed. That is not the same as wanting a single currency. The mistake in this headline is it falsely makes the assumption that Cameron wants a single currency and therefore wants a single government.
John H: That sentence alone could mean anything. He is saying, if you read the rest of the article without blinkers on, that in the world there is no other currency that exists under multiple governments so therefore he cant see how it could work. Not that he wants a single government for the EU, just that he cant see how it would work without one and there is the challenge that must be address.
Just because he cant see it doesn’t mean that it cant happen though. He’s not exactly a visionary is he! Its just a challenge that the EU governments will have to figure out if they want it to succeed.
Does that explain my point?
They want a european union first and then combine it with the north american union and asia pacific – that’s been the plan all along.
Sounds cool. We’ll have world peace then. Exactly what everyone wants right?
Phil, there was another regime in the not too distant past who had the same ideals and wanted a one world order. I don’t know if perhaps you’ve heard of them, they were called the Nazis.
The same ideals as the Nazi’s? A lazy and silly comparison to make when you compare them in reality. What would be so wrong with a union between north America and Asia anyway?
There is already a (union) a lopsided horrific one. Here is how it works. We send asia and china our raw materials and then they churn out worthless crap that no one realy needs and sell it to America. The irony is the machines used to manufacutre the crud are not junk but superior machines (from the us) We have all the resources we need right here in America. How about a trade break off? How about refusing the influx of manufacured jink from abroad and start to make every town and city as self sufficient as possible.